I doubt it, I see no reason they couldn't continue using sandboxed services as they do now

But if you read the article even valve said fsync was basically good enough, why go this far if the improvements compared to fsync aren't amazing?

Rustless, mint? Probably just use LMDE

Even the article description is misleading, none of this is new, the only new bit is 64 bits which is cool I guess?

What's the thing to the left of Nina? Or rather where is it from?

LMAO this is really amusing. I hope it does some good but I doubt it

What's 14? 13 is still in testing so I'm surprised 15 has a name picked out

EDIT: Click the article dumbass

According to the article they did allow it. They got rid of that clause in a license update, just didn't allow you to modify your fork lol

The pedant in me dictates I must say you probably mean UEFI and not BIOS

...is it truly that bad? npm is the reason I don't even install software based on node on my machines... python doesn't seem nearly as bad by comparison? (I run it, just don't like to write it) Maybe it's worse than I realize

You're talking about Java(Jakarta) EE, my comment is primarily targeted at Java SE. I find that the Java standard library on its own and core language is pretty nice if you use modern versions like Java 21. If I had to complain it'd be about checked exceptions, they annoy me but otherwise the language is fine. I've never worked with the full enterprise web stack, I use servelts for web and do a large amount of Java SE desktop development, not with swing, fuck swing. Primarily LWJGL and JavaFX. I love that language, more than most. At work I use a lot of C# and I hate it, I miss Java when I have to write C#. I just don't love it, mostly due to all the little annoyances and missing things(no labeled breaks, no diamond operator for generics, etc). I try to use Java for projects where I can but it's not always an option.

Not a C++ developer, I prefer C. You are right in general however my understanding is that classes which are generic using templates must be fully implemented in header files because of how templates are implemented. That being said this code doesn't appear to use templates so I'm not entirely sure I get it either?