Thats a fucking terrible title, even though its technically accurate.

Read the article, it's actually pretty interesting.

Thats not the addw section (at least in the version im reading) but otherwise you are correct

Driver drowsiness and attention warning and advanced driver distraction warning systems shall be designed in such a way that those systems do not continuously record nor retain any data other than what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they were collected or otherwise processed within the closed-loop system. Furthermore, those data shall not be accessible or made available to third parties at any time and shall be immediately deleted after processing. Those systems shall also be designed to avoid overlap and shall not prompt the driver separately and concurrently or in a confusing manner where one action triggers both systems.

I maintain my stance that this is one of those "small steps" towards something much worse and that manufacturers will absolutely find a way around this to monetise it somehow (even in it's current form)

But I suppose we'll see.

Visibility

I doubt you've come across someone who claims that all truth is subjective all the time in all scenarios.

The example you give isn't an example of subjective truth, it's an example of wilful/conscious control of reality, which isn't the same thing.

I also doubt you've met anyone that claims truth is subjective to their will at any time they choose.

It's entirely possible, but unlikely.

Someone on earth vs someone on the ISS have different gravitational experiences for instance.

Anyone else seeing an older, rounder Michael Cera?

Life

For now : https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks

I have one also so I'm invested in how this plays out.

Also, people literally forced Disney’s hand by cancelling all of their subscriptions. Bullying corporations is extremely easy now that we have access to their social media.

They did, but the difference there is that disney already took a position and realised they'd fucked up directly (fiscally, disney absolutely does not give a fuck about morality or ethics ) and then had to backtrack.

Nintendo haven't (actively) taken a position yet, if they do then they'd have to face the backlash of whichever way that went in the court of public opinion.

by not taking a position they only get the backlash from the passive "support" of a position.

I agree but I'd also add that this doesn't automatically make them bad people, just people who aren't' compatible with you.

I'm not defending them, It's entirely possible they are bad people, but it's not a given.

What i mean by this is that it's not necessarily because of some flaw with you or them, it can just be that you don't match up right now(or ever).

I think it's important to understand that sometimes the only way to find out if you match is to try it and see, it sucks when it doesn't work out but the alternative is never really finding out if it could.

I don't think anti-trump is a strict requirement.

Not publicly and directly messaging a known rapist and convicted felon to let him know you think he's doing a good job "standing up for the little guy" would probably suffice.

Moving goalpoats, unrelated, more goalpost moving, claiming victory without any actual rebuttal, semi-truth, hope stated as fact, implication of stance not actually taken.

Hmm, a bit derivative but overall a solid entry, not as good as the last, still no immigrant references, i'll give this a 7/10 shitpost.

Hey, if you want to reinterpret what "vast majority" in the context of a political win means, you do you.