I know, when you explain once, it's fine, twice if you're generous, but if they ask for three explanations, it's because the other person is stupid. 
They're trying to force things on me, lies, wow, what a lovely place Lemmy is! I appreciate those who offer me support, even those who are ambiguous. Unfortunately, there are many people who seem allergic to research and don't understand that my art went months without being banned. The moderation dates are from when the post was published, and I know this because, unlike some, I realized the ban happened a week ago, and before that, my drawings remained untouched because they always reappeared. It doesn't even matter anymore whether I believe it or not; the outcome isn't going to change, and I'll continue with this unfair ban. But at least I defended myself. That art community is a mess, and many of the comments only reinforce the idiocy of all this; they always turn a plea for help into a circus. Grow up! It's all a race to see who's right instead of reasoning. I've been on the internet long enough to know who's an idiot and who isn't. This will be my last comment on the subject because they are truly exhausting, and I can be sure that I told the truth.
Como decimos nosotros en estas situaciones: Cállense gringos.
Technically and literally I didn't infringe on anything because it's not furry-related. What she creates without knowing what she's banning is another matter entirely.
Two points: 1- I already explained what furry is and what it isn't.
2- I use a translator and translate the page.
3- An extra point, haha. Here's an example of a yokai demon with a kemonomimi. Art I uploaded there.
4- Another extra example, normal/mythical animal art, without a antro.
They're confused because they lump everything related to animals into the category of furry, and it isn't. I assume that since you're a furry, you wouldn't compare a human or demon with animal features to a furry (or even a therian), much less a normal or mythical animal. Furthermore, according to that moderator's "logic," a fairy and a mermaid (things she posts in her communities) are furries—that's how ridiculous this is.
I'd been posting stuff about a demon and a woman with wolf ears and a tail for months, not furries. There was never a single comment from the moderators about it, and like I said, it's not furry.
I'll try.
I'll try, although I have no expectations.
To dispel further confusion, here's an example of yokai and kemono: purely human form with small animal features like horns, ears, a tail, and claws. Not furry, which is an animal in body and mind, being completely covered in fur, scales, feathers, or anything but human skin. Beasts are merely normal or mythical animals.
Hahaha, my profile picture isn't my art. My beastly art is animalistic, not antro. And my other drawings are yokai and kemono, humans with small animalistic features, like horns, ears, and tails. Here's an example of beastly art.
UserChan__
0 post score0 comment score

I understand your intention and I appreciate it, truly, but it doesn't help the problem because I've known for a while now (as shown in the Modlog screenshots) who's responsible for the ban. And of course, my point is that I can't contact them because they're only active in Digital Art (the community I was banned from). I can't comment on their posts, and I insist, Lemmy doesn't have secure direct messaging. Even if I wanted to contact you to chat, the only way would be to register on those external apps I mentioned, Element.io or Matrix, which I won't do. And if I did, I already know how they'd think of me, considering how they treated me.
If I wanted to talk to you, my message would get lost.