Viceversa

joined 7 months ago
[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do developers still code in such a manner?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Neither does systemd. They are optional.

Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously implemented those fields.

And in a DB that's not the case.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Programming language is a tool. Do you think there're no more tasks left where "mathy" programming language would be preferable?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

systemd devs successfully rage baited you and a bunch of others

Should that be their goal?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This field appeared in LDAP for different reasons, than age control.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No. A database doesn't have these specific fields by default.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because some can be rather large.

Did you see, what people could do with their arses? To the infinity and beyond!

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Are you Linda or her associate?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it would be golden

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can't read a text file without a program either.

view more: next ›