[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 days ago

Uff, thats really tough. Hang in there! I was fortunate enough to land a job, mostly because ppl I knew from uni recommended me.

Jeah, I am pretty disapointed that AI learned to code on my projects. Sometimes I wonder if it poisoned the model a bit at least... I had everything published I ever written, should have kept them on the floppy.

9
Personal Anecdote (fedinsfw.app)

It pains me, deeply, that I have to see AI in this form. From very early age I was facinated by programming, my childhood dream was to create a chat robot. I studied machine learning and linguistics, and coded a lot. I used the local library, they had books but internet connection was too expensive for my family.

In my teenage years I was the token nerd, I liked technology, I liked new and shiny things (still too poor to afford any), and the progess we the humanity achieved together.

Fast forward today, I work for a multi, as a software developer. I did not chose this carrier, It was the easy path. I already love problem solving and coding, so why not, it even pays well. Now it is threatened, by AI. And by AI I mean LLMs, unfortunately research did not get founded by the artificial hype, it is the opposite actually. Some already betting that AI can do the research in the next X months/years. (claiming the same number no matter when you ask them)

It pains me that a project, which aimed to help cancer screening went under. It was developed by a bioengeneering/developer team. I helped by coding a lean AI which tracked cells moving in 4D in scans. (3 spatial 1 time dimension)

In my work, there was a greate engineer, we talked a lot, and shared ideas for hobby projects (yeah, true nerds 😅) unfortunately he had to go to work elsewhere. But some days ago, he got the opportunity to get back to our company, but joined another team. We were the only two person in the office, as it was pretty late. I striked a conversation, because I saw he is just watching an agent writing his code. Or so I thought.

(Sorry its get a bit techincal) Someone created a change in the code, and forgot to change the unit test with it, so it is failed on the pipeline. He prompted an agentic AI to resolve the issue. I checked the changes, only some reworded variables, nothing that needs to modify the logic of the tests. I watched the running Agent: AI failed to run the environment, so modified the the main cmake, read at least 3 totaly unrelated source files, opened 36 terminal. Then 20 minutes later "solved" the problem. I did not watched him instructing the AI to commit the changes. The AI did. With the modified environment. Safe to say it broke the whole pipiline. The solution? Yeah ask AI what happend and fix it, make no mistake... Another half an our later, he had 5 variable names renamed.

Same person. I sent him an article of a common intrest, the link to the pdf, and watched as he opened, copy pasted the title to google, and read the AI summary. For a fking article which has an excellent abstratct already!

I lost hope. Send me hugs.

[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago

Bold you to assume there are sufficient client specs. Maybe the monetization path (yes to all manipulative way to squeeze money) ready.

[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago

So gather all information about a thing we should not watch? Kinda like asking for a link to be sure we can avoid it.

This is the 1st time I hear about it, so your post kinda defeats the purpuse, it sparks intrest.

No hate for you tho. I am against any kind of execution, deserved or otherwise. Making a circus + money out of it make me vomit.

[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 11 points 2 weeks ago

I think the OP meant to expand the rebel groups by creating your own or expanding by join an existing one, and not snitching by expanding the list on wiki.

[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I enjoy Kurzgesagt videos. They are a Science communication platfrom. And they simplify things greatly. So with literally every other Science communication, the goal is to show a topic and the audience should research it further. Anyone who thinks they provide whole objective truth is a fool. This does not make them evil, nor not evil.

I tried to watch the rumblings of the provided video, but I was unable. However I read the metr report

I highly recommend. Even for the non-tech savy. From page 5 to 20 it is a greate sci-fi story. Keep in mind tho: OpenAI provided the data, they used OpenAI's AI to structure/mine the data, and OpenAI had 100% access to redicate anyting.

My conclusion: Fuck AI companies. Especially OpenAI where incompetence is so high I might think it was deliberate.

I cannot fanthom they have 0 observability on a fking shared resource (artifactory). Why it was shared. Why agents had write permission in the 1st place (at least to create directories)

Why there was 0 monitoring on agents. I can't beleive they let programs run for days and hav 0 idea whats happening.

Why they were not separated from the internet, they had offline task.

Why impossible tasks was given to agents. Why the flags were generateble (default seed) Why agents knew they are tested? Etc.

This reeks of Incompetence or deliberate Malice. Malice not against running program code, against humanity, by creating an environment where the only possible solution generates a huge uproar and makes more money.

Also if a actual human would have done this, they would be sitting in a nice chilly jail cell. Why there is no responsibily? I really don't like to be a precedent of "woops my AI did it, it was a honest mistake I promise"

[-] VigorouSchematic@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 weeks ago

And Americans did elect trump who is ruining the world. The majority of people are voting with their money day by day to make billionaires more rich, and our only home more and more unhabitable even now. Nothing new, same old shit, same patterns.

VigorouSchematic

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 weeks ago