[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting read, too. Thanks! To bad we have to fight about "who came first", which becomes a "chicken or egg" question in my humble opinion. Instead of just living together and share the space. Like we do in most parts of the world.

;-) Or maybe we have to "give back" the area to the Greek (sea) folks?! But there is always the problem about where to move all the people to ...

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Right, I am totally aware of that historical bias. Thanks for the reminder anyway!

And I agree with most of your description. - Just making it clear: I am especially not basing my point of view on "the Bible stuff", but the broader historical information. So, the basic knowledge which is generally accepted by historians holds for me. Hence the reference on Wikipedia. (It's science. You trust the facts. And the cross-checked information. Until proven otherwise by new discovery.) About the details we can (and have to) discuss.

PS: Your image link is not working.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Well, that sounds like an app issue. Because this is one of the standard answers when you don't find opening hours. Sure, it's no "new" information, but at least you now know from the note that somebody has tried checking this, without success. - Is there a better way, in your opinion?

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Usually, in the StreetComplete App, you only add what is missing to one specific object. (As far as I have understood.) If you want to make sure that all parking spots in the neighbourhood are equally set, you have to double-check in the OSM web-editor. (That's how I do it.)

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Right you are! Did not checked when copying the title. But now it's edited.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Fully agree, that is worrying and they should not get a foot inside. Better if we would find some safe algorithm or independent moderation to filter the content according to law and ethics. And some independent payment service might also be helpfull, but no blockchain type, please. After all these years, I still don't understand the hate against LGB... groups. But it surely looks like the hunting the witches, Roma or Jews in the past. The are a distinctive minority and thus a good target, unfortunately.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

@cosmo@lemmy.world, you have solid good points here! - Yes, the laws are democratically set and don't need extra intereference by VISA, Mastercard or else. It is just my opinion that Valve has been very liberal on his marketplace and not removing critical content themselves. I think, that is what led to the interference in addtion to lobbyist behind the payment processors.

Yeah, my comparison was flawed. But I got the idea across. Right, the transaction process is not transparent, especially not without publishing the "hatelist". - Especially good point here with the ethical aspect! There seems to be some double standard by VISA etc. about what is acceptable and what is not. I disagree with that, of course, as I still believe in ethical values also when consuming games. ;-) So enjoy you porn game, als long as it has legal themes.

Actually, I am convinced. The article was bad and confused my inital kowledge about the issue. But thank you all for the (mostly) civil discussion. The petition unfortunately is outside my jurisdiction, so I can not sign. But I will keep an eye on the topic.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, yes. They are quite "heavy-wheight". And I might agree with their action now, but maybe another time it might be problematic for me. Also, that's how Capitalism works: The one with the money decide. But then, we should put pressure on them and not Valve! And the question remains: How would you solve that technically? (This is what the community is about. And I am looking for solutions, not problems here.)

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Come to Europe one day! We have a selection of the finest vending machines in most gas stations toilets for - behold - not only condoms, but also tampons, little toys for her or him, etc. All for just a few bucks. And not sketchy at all.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Interesting feature, surely possible. I have seen that on "Threema". Of course, secured by two layers of passwords/-phrases and strict connection procedure.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Well, as for many topics, also "privacy" in detail seems to be very different to many people. Personally I like the "auto-expire" feature in every messager app. But I also know people, who get angry about deleted chats. Because they forgot, what's been said in the past or they want to look up stuff months ago, or ... I else don't know.

[-] Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm ... are you talking about the original Signal app or the Molly app? Because I don't really understand your news here.

For me, as far as I am aware, Signal has always been synchronising the chat history. The only condition being, that you have connected your device before in the past, which I think is a good privacy feature. (Although, I haven't checked, how far back it goes. Never needed that.) - You don't want any random new device read all our history, or do you?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Vroomfondel

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago