This is honestly the best reputation a technology like this could have imo, because it very clearly shows that it does work
username checks out
if we define smart people to be anyone smarter than you, and stupid people to be anyone stupider than you, then it's actually both. Or neither. idk
Because they'd still like to know? it's generally expected to do some research on your own before asking other people, and inform them of what you've already tried
Calling an original, analogue recording a master does make sense, as all copies of it will by nature be of a lesser quality. This isn't the case for git branches tho.
Id pick the communities instance because that's the one responsible for federating the post and comments. Id only choose the instances a or c if b is or is planning to shutdown, or if I really wanted to show people what my home instance is
so true, he's a merge
considering it contains at least a couple sound files and is a flatpak 235 seems acceptable
relevant xkcd 
🎶its uncompressed asset time🎶
I completely agree, but isn't this what the developer signed up for when they chose the MIT Licence? not that ms couldn't just ignore a GPL Licence, but still
Xkdrxodrixkr
0 post score0 comment score
If you're running a corpo os on your hardware this could very much happen