In my case it doesnt appear in the App drawer but when I opened assistant it offered me switching to Gemini, which I did. Then within it, went to Apps to disable integrations like WhatsApp which by default was ON. Same with SMS and others.
a binary and a kernel module are not the same. And I was talking about business practices that are known. But nevermind, that was before I understood you are just trolling. Now I'll simply wish you a wonderful reddit experience.
Data brokers do exist... Who they buy from is the only privacy they respect. You know, capitalism.
Random act of vandalism? This was not some graffiti art..
I hear thee.
Just an update, I learnt that GrapheneOS developers are 'aggressive' towards other FLOSS projects (following comments on other thread, but you can searx grepheneos+controversy and see for yourselves).
So now, I might just prefer an FP6.
Perhaps you're new to this world, a troll, or just consumed too much disinformation. Some of your points have a certain nuisance, and are valid up to some degree. And, given that many people already answered politely... Instead of removing, I will lock this thread. Discussions are welcome, yet.. there's some tongue in cheek tone to this that I don't quite like (And it was reported as coming from ill faith.)
Not if you ocassionally send memes (:
You're probably over-complicating things. Have you heard about the find -print0 | xargs -0 idiom? all that variable interpolation (dir=${dir:2}) and quoting "'""${dir}""'" is better to be dealt by the built-in shell tools. Or you could write a script for the whole body of that while loop, and then call find . -exec ./action.sh {} \;. Same script could be used with the previously mentioned idiom too, you'd need to use bash -c ./action.sh though. One advantage of "find | xargs" is that you can run these concurrently, paralellizing the action to all your dirs, in groups, of say 4 of them... and so on... it's cool and simple.
async enters the chat
I have a similar feeling with flathub.org (arch with kde btw xd)
anzo
0 post score0 comment score
I think you're the one wrong. You were accusing zd9 to be defending diffusion models and LLMs. So they said: yes, I am precisely using those and not just any other machine learning algorithm. Yet, you didn't seem to understand... or you're just really unable to see yourself as being incorrect? :/