Yes, sounds about right. For general purpose decoupling that is a good value. Make sure to place it as close to the IC as possible. A longer path will add more "noise" to the system. Do read more about the capacitor type too since it can matter a lot. I suggest looking at Phil's Lab video on YouTube to learn more about this stuff
I think it would be wack for word processor application. Office work will never get boring anymore
Dude, his point is that if you did not implement partial rendering on a big file, the browser will have to work extra hard to render that shit. Not to mention if you add any interactivity on the client side like variable highlighting that needs to be context aware for each language... that basically turns your browser into VSCode, at that point just launch the browser based vscode using the . shortcut.
It's not a matter of the server side of things but rather on the client side of things.
I have CoolerMaster MM712. If I use the USB dongle the mouse goes to sleep after a while even when I am using it. So yeah, there are some quirky ones
What if... we add more dimension?
I think technically, the source should be the native format of whatever image manipulation program that you use. For vector graphics, there is svg format but the native editor is still preferable. Otherwise, whoever gets the end copy cannot easily modify or reproduce it, only copy it. But it of course depends on the definition of "easy" and a lot of other factors. Licensing is hard and it is because I am not a lawyer.
Diving suit... Neon Genesis?
I think the language is fair here since there are a lot of developers working on chrome. The language enabling mistakes like this is the fault because the sheer size of the project itself makes it unlikely any single person understands the whole codebase in detail. But then again, the C++ version used also matters since modern C++ also has tools to avoid footguns, but chrome predates those tools so shit is already set in stone.
Oh, I see. If that's how we would define it then yes of course. I mean, I already saw upscaler and other "AI" technologies being used on consumer hardware. That is actually useful AI. LLM usefulness compared to their resource consumption is IMHO not worth it.
To be honest, there is no good silver bullet solution. I've come across that problem too once and in the end I decided to just simplify my program. But my journey takes me to cap'n proto which IMHO is very ideal but it rarely has updates and the ecosystem around it is lacking. If you need to support many languages, then protobuf is the best. If you didn't mind it being open source, there is ZeroC ICE (mumble use this intensively). I pray that one day there is something like cap'n proto but also works for an embedded system.
Edit: Forgot to remind you that this is meta for programming.dev. You should check out other communities to ask this question. Mod may remove this.
bitfucker
0 post score0 comment score
Iirc, the requirement is basically a computing device than runs using AMD processor (I forgot about the GPU part, but maybe it must be AMD too), and uses NVME SSD. So, most modern system?