[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Kathy Castor (D-FL) - (202) 225-3376
Henry Cuellar (D-TX) - (202) 225-1640
Donald G. Davis (D-NC) - (202) 225-3101
Jared F. Golden (D-ME) - (202) 225-6306
Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX) - (202) 225-2531
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) - (202) 225-3536
Darren Soto (D-FL) - (202) 225-9889
Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) - (202) 225-6316

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

Ukraine forfeited sovereignty all the way back in 2014

There it is. Glad we found the position you're working from.

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

A RAND report discussing hypothetical ways to pressure Russia is not evidence that the U.S. secretly planned and initiated Russia’s invasion. An opinion article by one strategist in 2021 is not a declaration of NATO policy. Chomsky, Kennan, Matlock, and a 1997 open letter can all argue that NATO expansion was strategically unwise without establishing that Ukraine forfeited its sovereignty or that Putin was compelled to invade.

You’re also confusing "this policy might provoke a reaction" with "the reaction was caused by the policy and is therefore justified." Those are not the same sentence, no matter how much links you attach to them.

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

The report was published in 2019, after Russia had already invaded Ukraine in 2014. It discusses escalation risks; it does not say Russia was entitled to invade then, nor in 2022, nor does it transfer responsibility for Putin’s decisions to NATO. Try reading the dates as well as the adjectives.

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

The report was published in 2019, after Russia had already invaded Ukraine in 2014. It discusses escalation risks; it does not say Russia was entitled to invade, nor does it transfer responsibility for Putin’s decisions to NATO. Try reading the dates as well as the adjectives.

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

The paper written in 2019 describes how the invasion in 2022 was provoked?

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

What war? Keep going, you're almost there.

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Holy fuck. Did you read the comment you just replied to?

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Putin is playing the victim. Did you read the article you submitted?

Moscow increasingly views the Ukrainian strikes as attacks by NATO states because alliance members supply Kyiv with weapons and intelligence, the people said. The current phase of hostilities isn’t the peak of military escalation, they said.

President Vladimir Putin signaled his intentions in weekend comments to a state TV reporter, as he shrugged off the impact of the attacks on Russia’s economy. Ukraine “opened this Pandora’s box,” he said. “Well, be ready to get a blowback on your most sensitive sectors of the economy.”

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

it appears to be collateral damage (likely debris) from an attack aimed at other targets, not a planned strike on the childcare center

[-] crayons_to_chaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ain't no learnin down in the mines. Back to work.

view more: next ›

crayons_to_chaos

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 weeks ago