82
CDC orders mass retraction and revision of all CDC-affiliated research papers awaiting publication, across all science and medicine journals, to check for mention of LGBTQ-related terms
(insidemedicine.substack.com)
Reuters: CDC orders pullback of new scientific papers involving its researchers, source says:
The withdrawal order, first reported by the Inside Medicine Substack, goes beyond an initial directive on Jan. 21 that federal health agencies pause their own public communications to allow for a review of those materials by Trump appointees.
Inside Medicine published a list of specific words targeted for removal in the communications review, including gender, transgender, LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) and nonbinary. The federal official said that such a list went out from CDC to its divisions.
The Friday withdrawal order involves all manuscripts written or co-written by CDC scientists. If CDC scientists are co-authors on a paper that originated outside of the agency, they are asked to take their names off the paper, the official said.
It’s on F-Droid if you load their repo.
It is not allowed in F-Droid's official repos because it is not open source; anyone can run their own F-Droid repo and distribute proprietary software from it.
Also it’s open source but I understand some people don’t like their license.
It is not open source; that is a term with an internationally recognized definition. Even FUTO themselves now acknowledge it is not.
Thanks for editing, but I deleted your comment anyway because it was still just recommending something that is not open source.
fyi there is a thread here discussing the moderation of this thread.
The good news is that (sometime last year, long after you posted this) futo finally agreed to stop calling their license "open source"; unfortunately there are still some vocal fans of theirs arguing in various forums that it is.
Futo is not open source, as they (now, finally) even admit themselves: https://www.futo.org/about/futo-statement-on-opensource/
See also https://opensource.org/osd and https://opensource.org/authority and compare it to Futo's licenses; there are (at least) three reasons it doesn't qualify, can you spot them all? (rhetorical question; don't @ me)
I am locking this thread to avoid needing to remove misinformation and advocacy from Futo fans who think they should be allowed to redefine a term which there has been consensus about the definition of since before they were born.
even if it’s from its own repository, it is still on F-droid
There is nothing to stop anyone from running their own f-droid repo and distributing non-free software through it, which is what futo is doing.
seems open source enough
This is the definition. Compare it with Futo's license; it fails to meet both the Open Source Definition and Free Software Definition in several ways. After insisting they could redefine the term for a while (despite the definition's wide acceptance) and inspiring some of their very vocal fans to promulgate their dishonest argument on their behalf, Futo themselves finally came around and agreed to stop calling their software open source.
you just can’t understand what open-source means
FYI, nearly everyone (including Futo themselves), except for some Futo fans like yourself who haven't gotten the memo, agrees that this is the definition of "open source" (and Futo's license obviously does not qualify).
Other comments in this thread suggesting that Futo keyboard is open source have been deleted as offtopic.
usaid.gov is serving a redirect to www.usaid.gov which currently does not resolve.
189
Gustavo Petro responds to Trump: “Overthrow me…the Americas and humanity will respond”
(peoplesdispatch.org)
88
Gustavo Petro responds to Trump: “Overthrow me…the Americas and humanity will respond”
(peoplesdispatch.org)
146
Gaza checkpoint shell company outs itself as led by former CIA paramilitary chief
(jackpoulson.substack.com)
view more: next ›