[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

It was both political and relieved Texas from supporting illegal migrants. If more illegal migrants are allowed, more would be deported. Under Trump very few illegal migrants are crossing the border.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Trump won almost every state.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

40.8% looks good. There has to be motivation to become rich.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

If Biden was so anti-immigration, why did he permit so many illegal migrants that Governor Abbott of Texas bused them to sanctuary cities?

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Are you saying that El Salvador resembles the US more than Germany or Romania?

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Trump said that he would not seek a third term. If Democrats don't move toward the center, J.D. Vance will be the next President.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Biden did not have a strict border policy. Governor Abbott of Texas was busing illegal migrants to sanctuary cities where they were straining the resources of those cities.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Germany and Romania shows that people tend to have moderate rather than extreme views.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

No, Biden and Harris were too far to the left. Letting in a flood of illegal migrants is a leftist policy.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

He doesn't take orders from Russia, but he doesn't seem to realize the ramifications of what he's doing.

[-] direwolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

From https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/5292882-pentagon-china-risks-global-instability/

In late March, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued the Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance to the Pentagon. According to the guidance, as quoted by The Washington Post, “China is the Department’s sole pacing threat, and denial of a Chinese fait accompli seizure of Taiwan — while simultaneously defending the U.S. homeland is the Department’s sole pacing scenario.” The Pentagon is instructed, per the report, to plan only for contingencies with China.

Given the trends in the new administration, none of this is surprising, but it is shocking.

The document is a blueprint for geopolitical malpractice. The guidance’s identification of China as a major security threat, and thus a priority, is appropriate. But the prescribed downgrading of American commitments in Europe and the Middle East is a recipe for global instability, including in Asia. Violent conflagrations will follow.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

direwolf

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago