dukeofdummies

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno, that doesn't seem like a cheap boot.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I won't say it's hated but I feel like it completely fell under the radar because of covid.

Ron's Gone Wrong

I really liked it. It came out of 20th century studios, I suppose it's technically under Disney now. It got released and no one gave it the time of day.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Now you've reminded me of this joke again.

Gotta love that narrator. One of my favorite narrators in a movie.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Murdoch was dead on. I thought face was pretty good. Liam did a decent Hannibal and BA was fine.

What irked me was this weird back story of like... trying to let face taking over to lead the group sort of thing, plus the romance. It really rubbed me the wrong way.

Like, the A team isn't some club, they're this perfect storm of chaos towards bad guys, there isn't so much a hierarchy as just this inexplicable plot armor and audacity. If it wasn't all four it would all fall apart.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (30 children)

I don't even think it's an exclusively male thing. It's just getting harder and harder to meet people and mingle. Men are just feeling it harder and sooner.

It's harder to meet people now. I think part of it is:

  1. That people used to be bored. You would make entertainment where you could find it, and two bored people can rapidly get entertained. Now you have a phone that makes you not bored, and de-incentivizes face to face interaction.

  2. There used to be more places where people interacted. Masons, elk lodge, unions, they would often serve alcohol at events, for dirt cheap. They were known as third places, somewhere other than work and home. One thing I hear from a lot of smokers is that the smoking areas are where people hang out to talk, and they do. It's where conversations happen at a club. It gives you something to do when you're not talking, a reason to stand somewhere close to people, and a perfect excuse to jump into a conversation. It's kinda infuriating that it also shaves two minutes off your life -_-.

  3. People have less time. Younger generations are working multiple jobs, gigs with unpredictable hours, often times having commutes of an hour which turns a 9 to 5 into an 8 to 6, and spending all their vacation hours on the shit that has to be done on a weekday like the DMV or the like. How are you supposed to make a friend when schedules differ so much that a spreadsheet is required to make it work?

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh I agree, it's horrifying. And I have noooo guarantee that it's me doing the jump. Don't misunderstand I am NOT the only real mind in this example. I'm curently just hitching a ride on said laser beam. No guarantees that I will be the same or even exist if somebody so much as moves a pebble into the past from the future.

Existential dread all the way. If we get time travel I think it's as horrifying a prospect as teleportation on a universal scale with only the traveller maintaining continuity.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What happened to the timeline you left? It must still exist. You couldn’t have been the only consciousness that was experiencing it. To think otherwise is some extreme solipsism.

Why does it need to remain? It seems like solipsism to assume it must remain because it's your point of origin. If something or someone has the power to drop something into the past why wouldnt it overwrite everything? I don't see why consciousness even gets applied. The universe keeps on whether I am alive, asleep, or dead.

I see the path of time like a laser beam in a house of mirrors. If someone has the power to add a mirror somewhere. Yep, the whole beam after the fact is a vastly different pattern. Any multiverse would be entirely virtual and theoretical.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

You don't share food if you're starving. You don't share time if you work 12 hour days, every day.

If you spend all your energy on survival, you got no energy to spare on anyone else. I bet our hypothetical starving person would be moral and share, if they had the chance and materials.

If they don't... then it's not a matter of won't it's can't. People are more likely to share food they have excess of, time they have excess of. If they can't spare it, they won't.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

So what, then bribes and intimidation just... aren't actually effective ways of bending morals?

I gotta say I have 0 papers backing me, but I feel like the fact that the very concepts are words in the English language carries some weight.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sadly it was only 4 years ago. But Iowa does feel like that sometimes.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

... How much are you willing to overlook to keep yourself from going homeless?

There just ain't enough protection for whistleblowers right now.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Oh god it's a live action remake??? This is depressing.

view more: next ›