helpImTrappedOnline

So the remote screen lock only takes a phone number? No sign in necessary??? Edit: It needs a "security challange", so better than nothing. The funnier part is you need a phone to call their number after visiting the website. At least with "Find my" I can just login anywhere and lock it.

~~Could I enter my friend's phone number? Could someone make a script to to lock phones at random times???~~

~~That would be infuriating.~~

They didn't say that....they just said not to hook whatever smart TV they get to the internet.

Man didn't capatlize her name....at the start of a sentence. He had to back out of the autocorrect to do that (or use a desktop...but still)!

• Cheerios
• Honey nut cheerios
• Frosted Cheerios
• Chocolate Cheerios

And...

Uh...

Hmm....

The uh...

The one with the umm...

Errr...

I'm just kidding

You can pin buttons too. I have left/right cursor arrows and clipboard buttons pined. Super handy for me.

Yes, but capabilities are reduced.

Speaking of tracking, any one have any good suggestions?

Nah, you're thinking of the 2005 model year. This 1969 model is perfect.

Yes but at least they are getting unique ideas and not just whatever ad bullshit the general internet feeds them.

I also love the A+ prose.

Me too...but just to be safe I spent too much of my free time typing up a response.

No the government should not stay out of it.

How does this make any sense "if you, or anyone you know, has ever bought our taxi, you can not sue when our driver hits you"?

"Buyer beware" is not an argument when this shit is buried in pages of dence leagle documents or in some case never presented to the end user (in the case of a things like appliance delivery, where the buyer never sees the documents included). Do you expect me to hire a lawyer to buy a washer machine, or to sign up for a free Disney+ trail? Speaking of Disney, how about that "allergy friendly" restuant that killed someone with allergies. Theae forced arbitration clauses are letting ~~companies~~ people get away with wrongful deaths.

implied warranty of merchantability If the restaurant says their food does not contain an ingredient and they say the food prep is craefully done to ensure no cords contamination and someone dies because the ingredient was in the food - there's a problem and justice needs to be upheld.

Being a rebublicans or wanting "small goverment" has nothing to do with this. Yes too much gov intervention is bad, but with out it we'd still be eating rats in our hamburgers.

Don't bring abritarty sides into a problem when people are dying and no one is getting held accountable.

Yes and now he has many recommendations from a real form to guide his spending, not the equivalent of "hot singles in your area".