[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

By choice. Maybe they choose it to comfort Odo, or maybe because other humanoids recognize them as like Odo (the only shapeshifter they'd known before).

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We might be the same

Update my mesa drivers mid-game? Yea fuck it why not

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 11 months ago

What you're saying is irrelevant. In the real world, when an exit code is a boolean, 0 is true.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

I read the long E as a dot matrix printer noise https://youtu.be/tEJYNtI2ul4

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

Microsoft blocks people from downloading stuff all the time for unknowable reasons. You have to either reset your IP or go through customer support to fix it. I did the latter and they did not tell me why I was blocked in the first place.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

It depends on your velocity

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The compositor will have to implement a CLI. Sway has an IPC socket and CLI just like i3 and I can use this to hide windows.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

The previous code exists under an irrevocable open source license, so they are entitled to it. Also, fuck off.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 11 points 3 years ago

Defederating from Threads makes sense. Defederating transitively from anything federated with Threads ends in one of two ways: your instance shrivels up and dies, or you successfully kill Threads. Not particularly good odds. You can't compete with Meta, you can only try to maintain your independence and value as an independent platform.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I understand "we do not find value in RHEL rebuild." At least, I understand that it means "we do not find the value [to Red Hat] outweighs the cost [to Red Hat]." I don't understand how "simply rebuilding code... represents a real threat to open source companies." It makes it sound like the rebuilders are doing something wrong.

Sure, you can say that it hurts your profits if others are providing an equivalent to your service for free, but if that isn't acceptable, why allow it? Moreso, why allow it for years and then suddenly claim the communities built around that decision are a "threat"?

Maybe I'm misreading, but I think I would respect this position a lot more if it was simply "we can no longer afford the competitive disadvantage," rather than implying various open source communities are actually exploiting and damaging open source.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

kogasa

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago