Contrast with keying a car and being labeled a terrorist. By scratching a cybertruck, you become an enemy of the state—something a republican school shooter could never dream of.
Niccolò, KDE developer, made a video about Bryan's... everything. It's revolting. People still bringing up his stuff must be either unaware and thus should be informed, or they're complicit. Having talked to a few, I've noticed it's usually the latter.
If they're user funded, their incentives are fundamentally different from Google's. Even thinking as a business, it makes no sense to enshittify the way Google does. It's a different choice, even if it's not the choice you wanted.
This might sound controversial to you, but I don't want the rich being able to oppress people.
(Historically, that went horribly. It's still going horribly, in fact.)
I think you're being disingenuously generous with your interpretation of far right policies.
's what happens when one tires of getting surprise racism in hobby-talk.
I'm baffled by your comment.
Read again, it's not just interacting, he's praising, promoting, and gladly and voluntarily engaging with these people. Not "the wrong people." Say it with me: far-right misinformation propagandists, queerphobes, a genocide defender. Not "wrong", with scare quotes, but actually shitty people. And I'm not even done with that comment.
About your ridiculous defense of vaxry, I'm going to be straight with you: violating CoC or not is irrelevant. If you manage a community that toxic, don't see anything wrong with it, and don't want to do anything about it, it is normal to want nothing to do with you. No magical binding social contract is necessary for this—if you suck, people don't want to deal with you.
Collaborating in FDO isn't a natural right, it's a privilege earned by contributing. Vaxry made people not want to be there. Vaxry was detracting.
Your entire reply reeks of "it's not that bad," which to me reads as "I don't think those things are bad" and sincerely makes me not want to talk with you further if that's truly the case.
EDIT: So, I checked your profile, and you have a giant comment thread on things you dislike about DEI, and you also do mental gymnastics to defend the right. Cool, cool. And a comment equivalating "what if kamala did the sieg hail" to the question "what if elon did it?"
Whenever someone says, "who cares, proton VPN is free," I get a bit sadder. If Proton ever drops the free tier, honestly? I'll understand. Because God knows, seeing people who can't be fucked to give a damn about open access to information using costly infrastructure to watch their shitty porn, I might've just cut it already.
This might be a little off-topic, but I've noticed what seems to be a trend of anti-AI discourse ignoring programmers. Protect artists, writers, animators, actors, voice-actors... programmers, who? No idea if it's because they're partly to blame, or people are simply unaware code is also stolen by AI companies—still waiting on that GitHub Copilot lawsuit—but the end result appears to be a general lack of care about GenAI in coding.
Maybe this is part of why I keep bouncing off Mastodon. It feels tight-knit. It's about individuals, about relationships.
I don't fit in such a system. I've nothing to offer in a relationship, I cannot be a "comrade." Still, I want news, media, and easily accessible knowledge being shared.
So, I'm a lurker, a consumer. I tend towards anonymous forums and spaces centered around topics rather than people. Or, I seek celebrities, and sellers, and content creators.
Either sort-of give me something I want, while Mastodon doesn't. Too focused on the people, but without big names to follow.
I think you answered your own question? It depends on meaning and context, not just words themselves. And while positive messages intersect the overarching topic, they're different enough that we can't just bundle them together and treat them in the same fashion.
I like Big Dick Energy though. Can we keep that?
Can't handle the magnitude of that question on my own, I'm afraid.
That's inaccurate and reductive. ATproto and ActivityPub do not federate the same way, and how they work greatly affects how users interact with the entire ecosystem.
On Mastodon, pick the wrong instance and there's content you'll never see, migration isn't complete, discovery is so bad they started a new initiative to try fixing it, instances have their own cultures, and so on.
Bluesky has issues, some I'd consider critical, but they're not directly user-facing for the most part. Make an account, you get the same experience as everyone else.
edit: Sorry, I have this issue where I try to be concise, yet feel like I end up being rude. I get your confusion, but they're quite different. Hopefully this helped; I can elaborate if you want.
Yes, I like the unethical thing... but it's the fault of people who are against it. You see, I thought they were annoying, and that justifies anything the other side does, really.
In my new podcast, I explain how I used this same approach to reimagine my stance on LGBT rights. You see, a person with the trans flag was mean to me on twitter, so I voted for—