nuscheltier

joined 2 years ago
[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

If you don't need ac, that's okay.
But since temperatures will rise over the next years, we need AC for those people that cannot handle the heat, like kids, elderly, medically compromised people. And the higher the temperature rises the smaller the percentage of people who can handle high temperatures gets.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

... won't that be caught by the courts again? Do they play a game to get as many personal data as they can get till it comes back into effect?

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 6 points 6 months ago

I have to thank you for pointing out, that you wanted to say that automation would help more than let people work more. That is a fact that I lost sight of. :)

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Even that is just a one time boost. If the automation is done there is nothing to be done better. So to grow further people have to be fired or other sources of revenue have to be unlocked.
I still think, sustained growth is impossible in the long run.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are people he has to share the wealth and power with. This is something that isn't right. That has to be rectified. /s

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

Thing is, dentist have to pay into that pension fund. It is required of them. So I can understand that they want to be rescued.
I'd love the executives and managers of the fund face the losses first before the dentist have their money taken away from them. Yes they make bank most of the time but since this is mandatory they should get some security for their spending. Or it could be the perfect opportuinty to get the dentist into the main pension fund for everyone else.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, it wouldn't. But it has another positive outcome. I don't know if that's what Björk is alluding to, but if Greenland would become independent and the USA would invade there would be no need for Denmark and NATO to do something and consequently NATO would not be on the brink of collapse.
I still think that NATO isn't on the brink of collapse since they could just throw the USA out. We'd still have a nuclear shield by means of France and Britain and while the US is a big contributer the other members of NATO are still there and could muster a defense.
I also think that it isn't a good idea to sacrifice Greenland to us imperialism because it won't stop them. It wouldn't stop Putin it didn't stop Hitler, it will not stop the Trump administration.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 2 points 8 months ago

oh, a new Jolla. That is nice

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And I always wanted to learn Icelandic but haven't found an online source to do so.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago

Still only posting good news (regardless of source) for entity A and only bad news (regardless of source) for entity B will skew the opinion of the reader to entity A. And that was what was mentioned.

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh, thanks. I'll try that one. :)

[–] nuscheltier@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)
view more: next ›