FreeBSD is way better in security record
After accounting for the massive difference in number of eyeballs actually looking for vulns?
FreeBSD is way better in security record
After accounting for the massive difference in number of eyeballs actually looking for vulns?
Yea this is some BS... gnome doesn't need any help to burn their own reputation to the ground, this is just a hitpiece by yet another one of their out of touch high and mighty contributors.
To be fair, nobody of any political stance did anything about it whatsoever.
I have. You just don't hang out in the "right" places
we’re carving a space for companies to safely share
To be fair, it's no safer than being GPL etc. in that any license is only as useful as your ability to enforce it in court. For a bad actor, whether they violate a fair source license vs a GPL likely isn't much of a concern at all.
Not only that but it relies on the Pixel's black box "Titan" security chip, that google pinky-promised to open source but never did...
Maybe they're saying we don't really know how big or small they got.
Atheros ath9k (and previously ath5k) has been 100% FOSS for many years.
A more interesting statistic to me is that police are the least likely to respond properly to a crime when it's raining.
yea just wait until they find out why the first digital computer was made:
ENIAC was designed by John Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert to calculate artillery firing tables for the United States Army's Ballistic Research Laboratory (which later became a part of the Army Research Laboratory). However, its first program was a study of the feasibility of the thermonuclear weapon.
Good thing there aren't any operating system vendors actually operating out of Illinois.