This greatly depends on language design and implementation.

For example, Clojure has all of these and much more, and it's still much simpler and hassle free than rust. The functions are just functions, but the forms and lists that are very powerful.

functions are just

(defn foo [a b] (print "do thing"))

(foo 1 2)

With the power of destructuring that maps provide us, we can have named arguments:

(defn foo [a & {:keys [b c]}] (print a b c))

(foo 1 {:b 2, :c 3})

and for multi-arity functions, there's no special syntax. It's still just plain functions and forms

(def foo
  ([a] (print "I only have one" a)
  ([a b] (print "I have two" a b)))

It also has more advanced ways of polymorphysm with methods and protocols.

It depends on the design of the language.

The "people to avoid" section mostly has nothing to do with Omarchy

"banning" it will just make it "the cool forbidden thing"

Thanks! So probably, we can conclude that he's getting paid corporate money. Good for him, just a shame if others use it.

Btw, a very smart person can still make very stupid decisions.

I think I did! Rust has lots of corporate and political backing from big companies and political/security firms (FBI, pentagon etc) and zig is more free and has less governance and backing, less politics involved.

I've heard bad things about both. Proton implies a lot of lock in and you almost can't use it with custom clients (thunderbird, aerc)

Tuta's support is pretty much nonexistent.

Very wierd of you to assume there will be spyware on samsung but not google phones

Fedora is corporate bullshit. I stay away from it even though its works good.

People are insane. They just want someone to hate on to say they are better.

Oh too bad their shows always sell out arenas. Perform to empty crowds? You people live in your heads.

Works perfectly

So they approve of zucc, whoever tf runs google, jeff bezos and other pieces of shit, but elon is the breaking point for them? That's a stupid reason if you ask me.