stinky

article does not mention cooperation with police?

I kind of wish this beautiful animation, huge effort, high budget and excellent storytelling hadn't been the product of a fucking Riot game. That company, its business model and its players are so toxic the success of the Arcane series feels hollow to me.

You, and, and anyone can freely discuss the definition of anarchy because it's publicly available.

My preconception is not. That's why you're wrong.

Have the day you deserve.

I'm free to take this seriously because it's a serious topic. Don't try to cover your butt by saying, "I was just kidding," or "don't take this seriously." If you mean what you say, be accountable and stand up for it.

You're jabbing me, you say so yourself. I'm not interested in trading more barbs so I'm disengaging. Good luck with effecting change.

I'm not trolling and I won't allow you to suggest that I am. Your failure to understand what I meant doesn't mean my efforts were deliberately obtuse; it means you failed to find understanding.

And I didn't say you're required to educate anyone. I said that if you want valuable discussion, changed opinions, or growth of any kind, you need to do the work to get there. You haven't done anything but make noise.

What's my preconception? If you're saying it's false, you need to be able to say what it is. Otherwise your response is without value.

Very good clarifying follow up! The information you provided is really useful, especially considering a discussion is about a lack of information. Thanks for your input! Twice, by the way.

Very good clarifying follow up! The information you provided is really useful, especially considering a discussion is about a lack of information. Thanks for your input! Twice, by the way.

I'm not

Arstechnica doesn't cite its sources? All it has are links to more Arstechnica articles.

The above article says,

In the US, the feds are currently testing whether existing laws protecting kids against abuse are enough to shield kids from AI harms.

..but doesn't cite any sources. There's an embedded link, back to Arstechnica. What the fuck?

I'm enjoying it as well - there's a lot of love here. The author has dedicated years of their life to understanding this phenomenon and how to address it; there's theory, practical uses and tons of documentation.

You don't need to match energy with fools folks. Keep doing what you love, even if inconsiderate braindead chumps give you a "No."