295
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
295 points (96.0% liked)
politics
19047 readers
3994 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those are awfully specific. Sounds like nothing more than a couple anecdotes.
If Harris is anything like my first wife, I’ll vote for her every time. After all, I’ve been happily married to her for 13 years tomorrow 🥰
I also choose this guy's wife
Congrats!
Congrats! It will be 13 for me & my wife in just about 2 months.
Psh... Real men cheat on their wives with porn stars n get married like 5 times. You know, strong Christian values.
13? That's excellent. Married for 9 here, after a brief 25-year courtship.
Good to see it worked out, even after rushing into things.
Happy Anni! And, same.
Well played, on both the retort and the marriage. May many more happy years comr to you. And everyone else, really, we could all do with some happy years.
If you've been happily married to her all this time, why are you referring to her as your first wife? And not just your wife?
Because humor requires the subversion of expectations, and it mirrored the original statement nicely.
Because they are Numenorean and unfortunately will long outlive her.
You never know bro.
Trump is most popular with divorced men. So.. probably heard it at least more than once in their focus groups.
I suspect he’s even more popular among sex offenders, but they don’t get polled specifically.
"Would you have flown with Trump to Epstein island and gotten a totally-appropriate massage from a thirteen year old girl complete with happy ending? And would you vote for Trump today?"
Ah yes. The "Ranting at FB Live in my truck wearing aviators" demographic.
But nothing about Trump seems lawyerly.
He lies a lot, changes positions whenever convenient, and he's pretty much always involved in one legal battle or another. He's basically the lawyer from every lawyer joke minus the law degree.
Minus any resemblance of intelligence or logical planning beyond immediate self-gratification.
Him driving over a cliff would be a good start.
Saul Goodman for president
Yeah, that's kind of wildly specific. First wife? Some people only have the one, or even none.
The guy is a Republican, though. They tend to want to trade in their wife for a newer model occasionally.
He does focus groups. It's all about getting more detail, specifics, and answers to open ended questions to (in theory) get deeper insights from a smaller group of people instead of more generic metrics from a larger group. Qualitative data rather than quantitative data.
I wouldn't be surprised if he got those comparisons from participants. But (without actually watching the interview) I would have to assume that he's using those statements to represent mildly negative sentiments about Harris from Republican men, and contrasting it with much more severe negativity among Republican women when it comes to Trump.
I raised an eyebrow too, what a weird thing to say