this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
606 points (99.3% liked)

Apple

17537 readers
64 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

No. Strictly and technically speaking, LLMs absolutely fall under the category of AI. You’re thinking of AGI, which is a subset of AI, and which LLMs will be a necessary but insufficient component of.

I’m an AI Engineer; I’ve taken to, in my circles, calling AI “Algorithmic Intelligence” rather than “Artificial Intelligence.” It’s far more fitting term for what is happening. But until the Yanns and Ngs and Hintons of the field start calling it that, we’re stuck with it.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Where intelligence in spitting out samples from big data vaguely related to prompt?

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let's just settle on SI, Schrödiger intelligence.

[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

I like your definition. Algorithmic intelligence fits much better. And thanks for giving me a rabbit hole (AGI) to dive into.

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Approximate Intelligence fits just as well me thinks

[–] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know more humans that fit that description than language models.