this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10192 readers
114 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[alt text: a screenshot of a tweet by @delaney_nolan, which says, "Biden/Harris saw this polling and decided to keep unconditionally arming Israel". Below the tweet is a screenshot from an article, which states: "In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they'd be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they'd be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely."]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  • Media fault: 20%
  • Putin / Musk / etc interference fault: 25%
  • America dumb fault: 30%
  • Long history of shitty Democrats fault: 15%
  • Kamala Harris fault: 10%

Sure, you can say she shouldn't have done the 10%. Would it have been enough? After watching what Biden did and how people reacted to him, probably not.

But anyway, we'll never know. Also, I don't know why the 10% is the most important part, to you. The other parts are fixable, going forward.

Well, maybe not now.

(Edit: Math is hard)

[โ€“] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Its not actually, I just said in the end, she had to produce and she didn't. I blame the media the most, but they're just the propaganda arm of the oligarchy.