this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
39 points (89.8% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2362 readers
3 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Synopsis

(trying to be neutral here)

Hazycora[^1] was informally hired to work on Loops web UI. Then Daniel[^2] posted about his idea to launch a video ads network for Loops (which he latter admitted was a joke), and Hazycora commented that such posts hurt people's trust in him.

This was followed by an avalanche of mutual accusations, which I shall not dwell, as a result Hazycora no longer works for Loops.

Consequences

  • Accounts using "hazy.gay" email domain were banned on loops.video with a fake dubstep-posting Kamala Harris account as an excuse. This also breaks guest browsing on loops.gay.
  • Hazycora's username on loops.video was forcibly changed from single-letter "h" to "hazellll".
  • Disassemblies of the Loops client were published on GitHub.
  • Hazycora says she has got more than $500 in donations in the past two days; Daniel says his following count is growing, and hers are going down; both claims need verification.

Footnotes

[^1]: Admin of besties.house and git.gay. Created loops.gay, the first web client for Loops. [^2]: Daniel Supernault (aka "dansup"). Creator of Pixelfed (federated Instagram clone), Loops (federated TikTok clone), FediDB, fediverse.info, pubkit.net and yet unreleased Sup messenger.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd prefer not to as I don't want to smear the man. He does some fantastic things with the majority of his time.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You already did smear the man. That's why I'm asking about the details, because I suspect that you have none and are smearing him unfairly.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What in the weirdo behaviour is this?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

'He's skeezy but I won't go into details.'

Do.

'No man you're being weird.'

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sounds like I got my answer. Usually, if someone makes vague insinuations against someone, it's fair to ask for details. Making snide remarks to smear someone, but then refusing to elaborate with details that could be verified, is weird.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 week ago

If someone said that I'd done something questionable, I really hope someone like you doesn't pipe up to try and make a mountain out of a molehill.

[–] DeadPand@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds more like you are delusional and making things up.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 0 points 1 week ago

What, you mean when I said, "It’s not the first questionable thing DeadPand has done and it won’t be the last," and then got quiet when asked what I'm even talking about?