895

Sounds like maybe Trump did know something about Project 2025 after all...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 163 points 2 years ago

the part that pisses me off the most about this is that the democrats all read the thrice-damned playbook.

Like. WHY THE FUCK DO THEY NOT HAVE A PLAN?!

oh. that and the fucking nazis are winning.

That’s genuinely the most sanity-destroying part of this for me.

They made a playbook years ago. They said they made it. The posted it openly on the internet years ago. They said they’d follow the playbook. They’re now following the playbook. They’re continuing to follow the playbook. They are completing entire sections of the playbook, according to what was written in the playbook. They will continue to follow the playbook.

This is not a surprise. You are not allowed to be surprised by this. Fucking stop it.

And yet: all the Democratic leadership and rank-and-file - save for a very small handful of progressives - are all in a constant state of shock and surprise. What the absolute fuck. How. HOW.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

and more infuriating- they ran on "WE NEED TO FIGHT THIS".

Right? And then they fucking softballed it. Like, what the fuck. What the actual fuck.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

“We can’t remove the filibuster… what if we need it?!”…

(Some time later, when it’s needed…)

“Best we can do is…. NOTHING”

  • Cluck-Cluck Chuck

I’m also quite certain the fascists will ditch the filibuster the second orangeboi asks them to

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yup.

At this point, the republicans can’t fold fast enough, and democrats are just stepping aside because “reasons”.

There’s only a handful of people actually standing up.

The Republican aren’t folding. They’re putting their armbands on.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes. But even 10, 20 years ago there would have been a few being like, “fuck no.” They’re all folding and toeing the line. (And yes, putting on the armbands and the diapers and the maxi pads over thermal ears.)

For example, Ukraine and Russia.

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I wonder if Lemmy could band together to create a playbook? A "Project Progressive Liberty" playbook if you will....

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Democrats aren't revolutionaries. They're legislators. Most of them didn't sign up for this but for normal work.

It does mean we have the wrong people in office when we need fighters, but I don't see how you can throw all the blame on them.

They're the ones who are afraid of going to Gitmo, assuming they aren't otherwise disappeared.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

I hate to be that guy, but do you or they really think that’s gonna stop them?

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No. The people are going to have to do it. Or the military, but that rarely ends well for anyone.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

this is what they ran on to stop, at least in part.

more over, I didn't sign up for this shit either. If they don't start doing their job, we will be going to a civil war- a civil war that will make the last one look like a block party.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's all fair. I'm not at all satisfied with their performance, just not surprised. Legislators don't know how to respond to the Gish Gallop, especially when it's taken the top offices.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I guess the biggest issue I have is when legislators are whining about it.

"Well I didn't sign up for this!"

Except you kinda did. and the time to act was over the last four and a quarter years... with the whole apparently lacking an understand of where it's going.

[-] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

What will it take to supplant them and take control of the party or delegitimize them as a viable 2nd party in the awful two party system and replace the party with something progressive that represents workers other than more of the same?

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I don't see a voting way out of this, sadly.

So if it's a revolution, and we win, we then get to institute different rules that don't lead to the inevitable two party domination.

[-] Rainbowsaurus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Oh, they have a plan. It's in the half-dozen fundraising texts I get every day. Trump is clearly good for democrats' business and it makes me sick.

[-] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

The Dems are following the plan because they are complicit.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
895 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31317 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS