907
Trump once hosted party for ‘young women’ where Epstein was only guest, says report
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
907 points (99.2% liked)
News
38827 readers
1510 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Let's not pretend Bill Clinton wasn't Epstein's buddy too. The DNC is just as disgusting, and until liberals realize they're actually just neo-liberals, nothing change.
Your downvotes won't take Bill Clinton off the Epstein client list, you're denying it exactly like Magats deny Trump's.
Nobody here is defending Bill, and he's not the POTUS. Your whataboutism is gross.
I mean the comment they replied to is literally downplaying the involvement of other pedophiles just as involved as Trump was. It doesn't matter if it's using sarcasm to do it or not. That's the intention.
The entire point people should get out of this is that defending rich pedophiles (much like defending Israel) is a bipartisan issue that both parties will always agree on. Do they spin it differently. Sure. But come the fuck on.
The person doing "whataboutism" is the person that made the initial sarcastic comment. Literally bringing up other sex pests for the exact same reason their comment is making fun of. To compare the sex pests between parties and downplay their involvement by comparison.
You can't say "whataboutism" when the literal comment your replying to was responding to and criticizing a "whataboutism" in the first place.
The original comment was in the voice of Trump. It's the type of thing he would say to distract from people looking into him. It was satire, not sarcasm.
Learn context clues. You're ranting about something that wasn't even an issue.
Bill Clinton isn't currently president. Focus on the real problem first, and surprisingly you'll probably pull the rest down with him. Weird, eh?!
The bullshit-ass false equivalency benefits fascists, so I guess you're outing yourself as one here. Whoops.
Aye comrade
Bill Clinton was a sleazy fuck. He used his position to get a blowie from an intern and a big deal was made of it. But I'm pretty sure the only one who tried to cover it up was the man himself. But to the best of my knowledge he didn't rape children at organised child rape parties with other child rapists. If it comes out that he did, then lock his ass up and throw away the key. A pedo's a pedo. Politics doesn't matter here.
Well he was on the flight logs with Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacy, and Donald Trump.
There has been no attempt to prosecute them.
All the more reason to make the files public.
Ничельный insult в русском языке.
We already know about clinton comrade. But Epstein said he was best friends with Trump for 15 years. That more relevant because he's the president today.
Jokes on you I don't like Bill Clinton either or any other child molesters
I don't know a single liberal that doesn't want Clinton to get arrested if he's on the list.
How about all the liberals in Congress?
Not too many of them. If you mean Democrats, any Epstein Democrats are as fair game as any MAGAs. Toss'em all in the hole, I don't care about them. We can replace them with new Representatives that will work for the people.
That might be a good litmus test for which ones are actual liberals.
I think you and the person you're responding to have different definitions of lib.
You're getting down voted for arguing with what is VERY OBVIOUSLY a sarcastic impression of a right winger response. No one is denying anything, you just decided to argue with a joke
Fucking team sports man. But in politics it's apparently who is less of a pedophile this week.
BlueMaga almost as dumb as Maga I swear.
The whole country has proven dumb.
Period.
One of the most disappointing things is seeing how excited libs are for some "abundance" policy. Like, they see the rise of fascism and maga voters regretting their choice and think to themselves "what if we did MORE neoliberalism?!"
I can't believe they can fall for the same vague promises with zero policy over and over and still think the maga voters are the only dumb ones.