1030
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 227 points 1 year ago

Zelenskyy did it. Ukraine would no longer exist as a sovereign nation today if he didn't; it would have been entirely annexed into Russia right now.

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 year ago

Exactly. In the US right now, only a comedian is capable of getting the joke. It works everywhere else it's been tried. Vote Stewart!

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago
[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Nice! How could I have forgotten this guy? Great reference

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

How did real life end up more grimdark than Watchmen?

[-] MrSmith@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I mean, Trump did it and he was a fucking TV clown. The bar is really, really, reaaaaaaally low for who can become the next US president.

[-] Mandrilleren@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

Probably not. It's pretty common in history that leaders that are great In crisises aren't as great in peace times. But it doesn't really matter because what Ukraine needed was the president they had.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It'd be a better analog if everything else Zelenskyy has done as president wasn't eclipsed by Russia invading. Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn't happened? We'll never know.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 69 points 1 year ago

He stepped up as a leader when his nation needed him. That is one of the best qualities to have. Anything else is just whatsboutism that can be applied to anyone.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Nobody is questioning his bravery or accomplishments, but peacetime politics require particular skills.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 year ago

The US is in far from normal times. It may not be a military war (yet) but this sure as hell isn’t “peacetime”

[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The question is moot. He was the right person at the right time

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago

Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn't happened? We'll never know.

A quick glance back shows very much no. However, he stepped up for the war.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'm curious why you didn't think he was a good president.

He made a lot of very popular moves between 2019 and 2022.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
1030 points (95.0% liked)

politics

31317 readers
2821 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS