World News

22060 readers

191 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

112

Using loophole, Seward County, NE seizes millions from motorists without convicting them of crimes (flatwaterfreepress.org)

submitted 1 year ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vorticity@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I've never understood how civil asset forfeiture is constitutional. It seems like a 4th amendment violation.

Can someone point me to the judicial decisions that lead to this being legal?

[–] Widget@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Because it usually happens to "those" people.

[–] SlowNPC@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It is a 4th amendment violation, but some shit judge ruled otherwise at some point so they get to pretend it isn't.

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It IS 4th amendment violation, period. It just that we're suffering from the repercussion of the fundamental problem with Common Law (USA and UK) vs Civil Law (Rest of Europe except UK.)

Reference on this. And scroll down and you'll see a row saying "Constitution: Always (For Civil Law) and Not Always (For Common Law.)

In a court of law, they make it a legal-game-scenario where constitutional rights aren't automatically applied to you and you have to explicitly invoked it at the right time. That kind of crap is asinine and why I think we need an overhaul politically.