this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
519 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37732 readers
473 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Plume@beehaw.org 175 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The utter irony of r/AntiWork being forced to reopen is astounding. Strike broken. Union busted. It's over.

[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they are toast, forcing these open will not save them long term. the fact that they had to go here shows how effective this has really been.

no one expect them to close doors tomorrow, and I still think they IPO, lots of dumpster fires IPO. Will still be a dumpster fire and at some point it will be "huh, you still go to that trash site"?

Its happened to ever corp social network.

[–] GeekyOnion@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you hit on one of the key points. Every other time this same pattern has played out, each of those sites becomes a shadow of what they once were, but the continue because (to be blunt) running Internet sites is CHEAP.

[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 3 points 1 year ago

yup, very often the investment is in continued development and marketing

critical mass is an asset

[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder why they’re forcing open not particularly advertiser friendly subs like piracy and antiwork?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Possibly conspiratorial thinking on my part, but the first reason I can think of is that those subs are both popular enough that they wouldn't want them fully migrating off reddit/closed forever, but also the kind of sub to not go along with unpopular decisions/ cause trouble. If you were looking to force a few subs open to serve as an example to mods of other subs that they must reopen or be replaced, you'd want to choose ones that aren't as likely to reopen on their own anyway after awhile, and who's moderation team you might want to replace, as you now have an excuse and the people who would get mad already are.

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I simply thing Reddit is using the opportunity to rid themselves of anticapitalist subs, the ones that would harm their image for the IPO. Remove the sources of future dissent.

[–] TheiaTheMoonMaker@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if it’s because they know the first few subs to be forced open will make headlines, but the second batch most likely won’t. So by starting with fringe subs it paints the picture that’s it’s not the bigger or more important subs that are participating in the blackout.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see the /r/antiwork mod’s disastrous appearance on Fox News become a talking point again paired with this, so that when people hear “Reddit forces mods to…” that’s the sort of person the public pictures.

[–] Gatsby@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt they want "reddit mods force open r/piracy community" to make headlines

[–] BeHereNow@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

that may not be a wasps nest they want to be poking.