this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
-2 points (33.3% liked)

Investing

1206 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussing investing news.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There was a pretty good analysis in Simply Wall Street, where they labeled the past quarter century as the high tech quarter (amongst others). Personally, climate collapse may well be the determining factor for the period 2025-2050. Any speculation what this will mean for investors (trends, individual stocks)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Here’s some comments that I found about this speaker: HSBC (his employer at the time) publicly distanced itself from Kirk’s remarks, stating they do not reflect the bank’s views or strategy. Kirk was suspended and later resigned. What I found instead: Most financial institutions, regulators, and scientists recognize climate change as a systemic risk. The Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) all warn that climate change poses significant risks to financial stability, including physical risks (e.g., extreme weather) and transition risks (e.g., stranded assets, regulatory changes)

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's right about the hit to GDP, its insignificant in the long run.

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He’s simply an unreliable source, and thus this movie and his statements are worthless. It is always good to doublecheck the sources. Yet, I’m now looking for the speaker that he refers to in his first few words, she may be more interesting to listen to, thanks for the pointer.