221
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?

[-] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago

... not used an LLM to write their apology?

I mean, I'm satisfied. This indicates to me they don't care. That's all I need to hear.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this... it's not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.

Would you have preferred no apology at all?

[-] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.

[-] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
221 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

5241 readers
25 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS