371
shame ๐ shame ๐ shame ๐
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
371 points (96.7% liked)
Firefox
9 readers
8 users here now
The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
- Firefox Customs: !FirefoxCSS@fedia.io
- Thunderbird: !Thunderbird@fedia.io
Rules
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Rules
-
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity. -
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated. -
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning. -
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please donโt fuel conspiracy thinking here. Donโt try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources. -
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate. -
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answersโwhich is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Google funds fascist political campaigns and I don't think Mozilla does. Seems worse to me than using shitter. And it doesn't matter if you are using another chromium fork, Google is still getting more power to control web standards if you use a browser based on theirs.
And Google funds Firefox, to the tune of basically their entire budget. They don't take individual donations.
I literally donate to Mozilla every month, so...
Is the point that you should go ahead and use chrome because Mozilla currently has a shitty funding model?
@TrickDacy @XLE I mean, why are you giving them money?
They are openly spitting in people's faces: https://www.quippd.com/writing/2025/11/27/thank-mozilla-for-killing-localization-on-support-mozilla-and-replacing-human-contributions-with-AI-bots.html
Two reasons:
Is your contention that more of mozilla's funding should come from google? Do you use a chromium browser? I hardly see how you're helping by trying to shame me for doing something I believe helps the world a teensy bit.
@TrickDacy No, my contention is that if Mozilla wants people to contribute to their cause, they shouldn't stomp on the people that support their cause.
Otherwise, other people can support whatever their new cause is - since it isn't compatible with what their stated cause is.
PS: No I don't use a Chromium browser. Shockingly, I still care about the open web.
Alright then. FYI, This sounds much more reasonable (especially in tone) than that first comment.
That is your first mistake. Many lemms live to do that. Particularly in the
.mlside.Yeah it's pretty much the fundamental problem with society, if you get down to it.
And to be fair I don't think they are wrong when they act that way. I understand. I also feel it is counter productive.
@TrickDacy @InternetCitizen2 That would seem to excuse a lot of damage - "locking up these protesters isn't perfect, but it is good", "removing these bike lanes isn't perfect, but it is good", "polluting in this river isn't perfect, but the chemicals we are selling is good".
I don't really think this sentiment works very well at all when defending things getting worse - I think people generally want to say that a modest improvement is better than none.
Is making things worse better than not?
I think this is a very willful misinterpretation of that phrase and it's not really something I can take seriously.
@TrickDacy I think people use this phrase to say that even if something isn't perfect, it's better than before - that is coming from my reading of the phrase on Wikipedia: "The phrase suggests that achieving absolute perfection may be impossible, and that the pursuit of perfection should not prevent someone from recognizing or completing work that is imperfect yet still valuable."
If you don't agree, I guess we can start there.
1/2
@TrickDacy In the case of AI, we are going from a good place to a worse one.
If the AI in Firefox is "the good", what is the "perfect"? More AI?
Maybe we need to agree that there is a version of Firefox with AI that is perfect before we can then agree that the implementation isn't perfect (but is good).
uh, what? The good is firefox today, the perfect would be some non existent browser which is fully open source and has no ethical or associative concerns whatsoever.
No one said anything about AI but you, and I've no idea why you brought it up. Not really looking to debate whether or not FF is perfect as that's a pretty ludicrous idea that I clearly never believed or articulated. The entire point I was making is that it's not perfect but it's better than chrome, ethically.
@TrickDacy Sorry, I missed the context here and my comment didn't make much sense.
Removing the dumb comments and sorry for wasting your time.