this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
251 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87184 readers
4482 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)
  1. Wrong country. We don't do that up here. Overall, we find this results in fewer unnecessarily dead people.

  2. Let's say he'd had a gun, and used it against the police. He would just have gotten hit with an additional charge that could have been anything from resisting arrest to first-degree murder, depending on how good a shot he was. So he'd still be in prison even after being proven innocent of the original charge. Real smart.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 6 days ago

You're replying to a common rage baiter. Please ignore them in the future.

[–] nothanks@lemmy.4d2.org -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

i believe the implication is that when injustice is commonly met with this response, those seeking to exert force upon others do their due diligence

versus the “only the state can do violence and we never make mistakes hurr hurr” that (ahem) they really want the global population to internalize

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can't stop the state from committing violence with a handgun, for crying out loud. Or even with a million handguns. The state will always have better equipment than you, most of which doesn't require anyone to get within handgun range if they don't want to. Granted, big missiles make a tremendous mess and they'd rather not use them, but the possibility is always there.

Expecting citizen violence to overthrow a modern government that's dead set on preventing it is, to put it politely, unrealistic. Unless you can convince the military to take your side or at least bow out, removing the government's ability to exert force, but you aren't going to accomplish that by directing violence at the military.

[–] nothanks@lemmy.4d2.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • not really the direction i was pointing out, but i’m always interested in the arms race between citizens and those that seek to rule. do you foresee heavier munitions being deployed (by any side)?
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

In which country?

I keep on remembering a line from an old anime: "An unjust peace is better than a just war." It keeps on floating through my head because it's true for most people most of the time. Things have to get really bad—really bad—or at least you have to persuade people that they are, before you start seeing organized, armed insurrection on a large scale.

So what does it take? Lots of people being killed, maimed, or raped, at random and without any recourse, usually. Stealing enough children might also do it. Or a faction deliberately whipping the less-intelligent part of the population into a frenzy. Or really poor quality of life over the course of decades that makes people think they have nothing to lose. And even then it takes time if everything was peaceful for a generation or more before that, because at first people will hunker down and claim they're dealing with "isolated incidents", and that it can't happen to them.

On the government side, what most governments want is to keep the economy running, because these days GDP is the measure of national success. For that, they need live workers and functioning civilian production equipment. That makes tear gas, handcuffs, and rubber bullets their weapons of choice and first resort.

For the government to haul out the big guns, one of two things has to happen. The first possibility is that it thinks it's losing control to a point where it no longer has enough jack-booted thugs to keep its interests protected, and starts killing people and destroying material assets to make sure that at least no one else can have them.

The other possibility is that the upper echelons go completely Nazi Germany/Khmer Rouge level batshit, and enact bizarre murderous policies founded in deranged idealism. At that point, they often cease caring how they kill. (This includes governments that define some group of the people living in their country as subhuman.)

Are we going to see heavier munitions deployed in Canada over civil insurrection in the near future? I doubt it (and if it does happen, it'll be in Alberta, not over the judiciary mistake from the original post). Is it going to happen anywhere in the world in the next decade? Possibly, because there are countries out there where people really do have nothing to lose and no way out, and governments whose grasp on power is shaky.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How's that working out for no-knock warrants in the USA?

[–] nothanks@lemmy.4d2.org 1 points 2 days ago

i don’t know - have you read anything interesting lately?