22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Don't get me wrong, I know the judicial system is pretty flawed, but their job is to rule on behalf of people's wellbeing, at least in the United States. The reason the school-to-prison pipeline even exists is due to pressure from for-profits similar to Facebook.

I do agree that it would be better for a judge to turn to an expert opinion in this kind of case, and to avoid lobbyist and corporate groups, specifically.

(And FWIW after I made my first comment did I realize that the author of this article is Mike Masnick, who is an advocate for social networks because he is employed by one.)

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the article's agenda is pretty overt. End of the day, I don't care about a corporations "rights" being violated, but this judge had the opportunity to do right by the public and set a precedent, and instead opted to shit all over it.

Wouldn't be surprised if he's actually unhappy with the jury's verdict, seeing as he's playing the "anti-corpo big-government over-reach" character to a tee.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Privacy

5082 readers
241 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS