this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

Wild Feed

616 readers
67 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Tag if needed:

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[D/M/Y] — If the publication is older than a month. You can just tag the year if the article is more than a year old.

[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.

*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason. Older publications are welcome as long as they include a date tag.

*Good quality means the source has a good reputation for accurate journalism with a reasonably clean fact checking record.

Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.

All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.

Sources posted here include:

https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/

https://www.apa.org/

apnews.com/

https://arstechnica.com/

https://www.theatlantic.com/

https://www.bbc.com/

https://www.earth.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/international

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/

https://lithub.com/

https://www.mentalfloss.com/

https://www.newscientist.com/

http://psychologytoday.com/

https://www.thequint.com/

https://www.reuters.com/

https://www.rfi.fr/en/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/

https://time.com/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us

Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.

Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Incidentally, I find popular stoicism to be grossly misapplied machismo (aka broicism). Just further evidence, along with Christianity, that people will take whatever you say and read what they want to hear into it.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

That's a good point. They were trying to avoid what modern philosophy calls sentimentality, not emotion altogether.

[–] Sicurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Agreed. I'm quite into stoicism myself but really tend to avoid contemporary stoic media because I assume it's just going to be more broicism. I'll be sticking to the ancients.

[–] crimson_iris@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, bros see "do not let your emotions run your life" and they think it means to become an unfeeling terminator who's never affected by anything. People see 'broics' regurgitate toxic masculinity, labeling it stoicism, and think that's what the philosophy is about.

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

'I'm a stoic, therefore I don't have to talk about my feelings ever!'

I had this stoic ex who was perfectly stoic, until he was not. Rinse and repeat perfect stoicism and mental crisis mode several times, and when he decided to also be a solipsist I left ...

What does keep the guys mentally well? I do suspect it works a little different to what women prefer.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

That' s a tough question to answer. I think lots of men do just as well in therapy, but lots of men find the whole thing extremely intimidating. I'd like to say they can just do their own work, without having to be vulnerable around someone else, but if they've been taught that being vulnerable is wrong, how are they going to let themselves be vulnerable even to themselves? How would they learn that it's OK?

I think maybe having male friends whom they respect be emotionally mature and caring people would probably be the best thing.

I'm not the right guy to ask. I see all this propaganda for "being vulnerable IS STRONG and VERY MACHO" and "being loving and caring is the most MANLY thing you can be" and my response is, "What are you fucking 3-years-old defining your entire personality by your genitalia?" The whole gender binary to me is ridiculous, but a lot of people cling to it for dear life.