I'd rather get no notifications than random nonsense from people who didn't actually engage with the article.
Wren
You must be well hydrated.
I'm so tempted to start banning people who comment without reading the article.
The article points out there is no such thing as unbiased observation.
That's hilarious. I respect your confidence.
We bought a $30 bag of cheese curds, and this was in ten years ago dollars.
With that incoherent mess? The question is a headline for the article linked.
Sounds like you didn't read the article.
For a second date we drove an hour out of the city to visit a cheese factory. That relationship lasted four years.
But she feels the way the museum describes the related history on panels in the exhibit is missing context.
While the displacement of Jews in the wake of Israel's creation and the Arab rejection of the UN resolution are acknowledged elsewhere in the museum, Asper said she fears not having that context included in the Nakba exhibit could fuel antisemitism.
Gail Asper's foundation is withholding money for a Holocaust exhibit to punish the museum for not making a Nakba exhibit about Jews enough. Might as well complain that the trail of tears isn't about colonial settlers.
I'd remove the "men" part and just say I hate the system and the system hates women.