this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
70 points (97.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49484 readers
646 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember watching The Hurt Locker (starring Jeremy Renner), the movie is meant to depict the Iraq War in 2004 but for some reason there's a scene where an iPod Touch (releases in 2007), XBOX 360 (releases in 2005) and Gears of War (releases in 2006) present in the barracks even though these did not exist yet. Another anachronism from this movie is when a American soldier spots an Iraqi recording him ready on uploading the footage via YouTube (the website didn't exist yet until 2005 when the story is set in 2004).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Something that constantly grinds my gears is (main) characters being anti-slavery while the slave trade is up and running in the historical context. I assure you: most people were pro-slave or didn’t care. Being anti-slavery was an extreme political opinion and wouldn’t be considered small talk.

[–] NightOps@nord.pub 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That reminds me of a war movie I've watched, when Josh Hartnett's character said "I think WWII has just started" during the attack on Pearl Harbor. (That line is historically inaccurate).

In reality, people would just consider it the "war" (referring to the European theater) or "Jap invasion of America" marking the US entry into the conflict (the term WWII was not coined yet until after).

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reminds me of Archduke Franz Ferdinand's dying words: "I've been shot! Time for the First World War."

[–] Anchorxiety@reddthat.com 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would pay good money to see that line uttered in a movie about the incident. Or just have characters constantly state the obvious like the audience had never heard of WW1 before.

"Gentlemen, Germany has invaded France. By God, this could become a multi year war of attrition and thousands could die!”

Make it a musical and I'm in.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Ah, the current trend of 'second screen' film making.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My kid's second grade class did a short version of All Quiet on the Western Front that bizarrely included the line

World War One has begun!

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Do they go to Mitchell Brook Primary School?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that a fictional school where obviously fictional things happen to make us laugh, like a primary school production of a harrowing WW1 book? What's the show?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I need more Big Fat Quiz in my life

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

It's the only thing about Christmas I look forward to these days.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hilarious talking about WWII before the end of the conflict! At the time, WWI was called “the Great War”, surely not “part I” of anything

[–] NightOps@nord.pub 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

There's another anachronism from that movie around 34 minutes in (during the scene where the nurses are on a transport ship heading for the hospital) as the movie is meant to be portraying 1941: you can literally see the USS Arizona memorial in the background as pictured and circled below:
hGXgAE8SiDqgAn9.png

It's a nitpicky detail that made it on the final cut, since that wasn't built until 1962 (way after the war!).

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I understand that the movie is quite awful, and I haven't seen it. Is this shot worse in motion, or did they consistently try to hide it with the handrails? If the latter, it's not really all that bad for on-location shot.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Highly context dependent, I guess, but the South seceded just because Lincoln was elected, even though he explicitly said he wasn't going to end slavery, so enough people must have been talking about it to spook the slavers.

?

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, in that context it would make sense, I’m mostly talking about media where it’s just dropped in to show the good morals of the character, while having no consequences of meaning outside of that

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Like in The Patriot when the British officer confronting Mel Gibson tells him his slaves will be seized, but then we find out he just has a bunch of free blacks who work for him because he's such a damn nice guy.

This despite him being a wealthy farmer in South Carolina at a time when it was essentially impossible that he wouldn't have owned slaves.

The character was most heavily inspired by Francis Marion

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, but that's kind of just how people are. I bitch about stuff all the time, but I don't do shit about any of it.

The type of person who would go to Kansas or Spain is exceedingly rare.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The way I analogize to abolitionism in the US c. 1800 is to ask how society feels about veganism today. Not as a strict moral equivalence but for the level of ambivalence, mockery, and outright disdain toward freeing a group society broadly considers chattel and with so much overlap in the arguments. "It's better for them; they're better-cared-for here." "Those abusive owners aren't the majority [somehow]." "My uncle owns an ethical farm." "The economy depends on it." "This is the natural order." "Might makes right." "Where would they all go if we magically freed them all right now immediately?" Shit, one of the few I see nowadays without a direct analog to back then is "plants feel pain", which I guess would've been about as analogously stupid as "industrial machinery feels pain too!"

This is going to piss some people off; fine, good even, that the point should be reinforced.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 6 points 1 day ago

That’s my rough equivalence as well!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is one of the things that makes me fucking adore the Temeraire series: the protagonist has a father who is staunchly abolitionist and yet the protagonist himself doesn't really think about it at all, until quite a bit later in the series when he starts realizing that slavery isn't just some theoretical thing in "the colonies".

Meanwhile the dragon protagonist goes "um, isn't that absolutely horrifying? am i missing something here??" when he learns about the existence of slavery, and this is absolutely pivotal to a lot of the plot in the later books!