355
submitted 4 days ago by zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 143 points 4 days ago

One thing I really dislike about the Mobile ecosystem is how much different each device is to each other.

Imagine owning a laptop and not being able to install linux without the manufacturer permission.

They really messed us up with how they created the phone architecture, so closed and restrictive.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

It used to be the same with x86 computers, but over time a standardized interface was developed.

ARM is already getting something similar, but most companies aren't interested, precisely because they're perfectly fine with the restrictions.

[-] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 62 points 4 days ago
[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 19 points 3 days ago

The ptoblem is that all the phone manufacters don't release any drivers, neither close or open

[-] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

nor document their hardware at all

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 22 points 4 days ago

There is a reason we are putting up with decades of legacy stuff still from the original x86 architecture in PCs... the compatibility of hardware and the standardisation even if it's through several extensions build off each other is unmatched.

ARM architecture might be much simpler but you constantly need hardware specific adaptions, which makes support for different mobile devices this mess.

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

IOW closed source drivers are the problem.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

One thing I really dislike about the Mobile ecosystem is how much different each device is to each other.

I thought you were sarcastic when I first read this part, since way back when phones used to be innovative in both hardware and software. The current market offerings are all carbon copies of eachother with a strong trend towards converging into the exact same lineup.

Multiple cameras, one in front, 2+ in back. A power button and two for volume. Reader apps may hijack it for scroll. Gesture movements. Fingerprint and face id. Less and less conusmer freedom in software choice. Irremovable battery. No removable back plate. A rectangular brick. A near-100% display area. No headphone jack or SD card, with SIM on the way out.

Covers the vast majority of offerings on the market, with a few slight adds/subtracts. Dumbphones are a rounding error.

This definition covers even tablets, and it isn't even deliverately vague.

Without much experimentation and development on the hardware front, no wonder software's behaving exactly the same.

There just isn't enough interest for proper innovation and experimentation.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago

Oh that's 100% true.

I was just thinking on the firmware of the thing. And how incompatible are they between models that are almost the same.

And as you say all phones are basically the same, there's no excuse for how little normalization there is in the software they carry.

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Just because they have the same function in the OS doesn't mean the hardware is the same. That's where custom ROMs falter, with closed sourced hardware drivers.

The issue isn't normalisation, it's inaccessibility to understand the core functionality to drive the hardware.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

And yet they're all the same

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

Imagine owning a laptop and not being able to install linux without the manufacturer permission.

Fairphone 6 ?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 3 days ago

The exception proves the rule.

[-] Untamed_Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago

And we're not even talking about iphone

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today -5 points 3 days ago

I think you don't really understand how hard it is to standardise everything. Just because IBM managed it in the 80s doesn't mean it was easy.

[-] peskypry@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

What the hell are you talking about? We have standards almost for everything now. It's just ARM ecosystem messed up as it were on purpose.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 6 points 3 days ago

It is on purpose

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What the hell are you talking about?? You've just made up this "ARM ecosystem" thing, when it never was a thing.

ARM design processors, then license those designs to other companies to build devices. There is no "ecosystem" because they don't define the rest of the device.

The "ecosystem" you're referring to is the overall phone itself, much of which is defined by Android and Google more than it is by ARM.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
355 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

43160 readers
309 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS