355
submitted 4 days ago by zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BigTurkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 days ago

Gonna buy one, gotta support the cause. We need this phone to do well.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Edit: @plyth@feddit.org pointed out that Motorola is in fact split into two separate companies. The phone company is effectively Lenovo, so Chinese, and not related to the American surveillance technology branch.

Not sure I'd trust Lenovo/Motorola Mobility either, but that's a different story.

In June 2026, Motorola bricked its whole line of routers without any explanation, leaving their customers with broken hardware.


~~The main thing you're supporting is Motorola, the second biggest provider of surveillance technology in the US after Flock. Deflock lists 5% of the cameras as Motorola, but the share is increasing as backlash against Flock is growing and Flock cameras are replaced with more low key competitors.~~

~~404media has reported on how Motorola cameras are used by ice.~~

~~"Gotta support the cause" is one hell of a dangerous sentiment under capitalism.~~

[-] yxc999@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

Damn I guess most of us didn't know that, thank you for sharing.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They're keeping a low profile on their surveillance technology while successfully marketing themselves as a privacy alternative in consumer tech. Its pretty fascinating to watch. I wouldn't blame anyone for missing it.

It's also worth reading up on Aviglon, a subsidiary of Motorola specializing in surveillance technology.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago

Different company?

Motorola was split into two independent public companies: Motorola Solutions (its legal successor) and Motorola Mobility (spun off), on January 4, 2011

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Fitting how the US part of the company does more survellance than the Chinese part

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

Or so we hope, anyway.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

GrapheneOS' cause is only theirs. They don't share with the ecosystem

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today -3 points 3 days ago

You're supporting diva devs selling out.

We don't need GOS to do well. We need a fully open ecosystem for phone operating systems. GOS devs don't let anyone incorporate their code.

They also refuse to provide basic functionality like inverted navbar buttons. Because they're diva devs.

[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

GOS devs don’t let anyone incorporate their code.

False

They also refuse to provide basic functionality like inverted navbar buttons.

This is supported in AOSP now.

Because they’re diva devs.

This doesn't seem like a mature thing to say just because you want to flip buttons and are annoyed that the privacy and security-focused project didn't add a feature to flip buttons.

[-] prex@aussie.zone 23 points 3 days ago

...don't let anyone else incorporate their code.

Is it not open source?

[-] TWeaK@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

It's open source, but the license agreement prohibits using it in other projects. You can do it for your own personal builds, but not any published builds.

[-] other8026@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

That's very false. There are other OSes with GrapheneOS code or forks of GrapheneOS.

[-] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

so, literally not open source by the OSI's definition, great

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
355 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

43160 readers
333 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS