364
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
364 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
87744 readers
3530 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
So fwiw, the change was made official and updated in GNIS the day it changed on Google Maps, which uses GNIS behind the scenes. That same day, USGS said the name had taken effect in GNIS but that it was waiting for its maps to visually update.
I think this is a product of Google's infrastructure being faster to automatically update with GNIS changes. The fact they didn't step in to override it already shows that they're willing to go along with this; I don't think the fact it changed before USGS adds any significance to that bootlicking.
That is, I don't assume Google manually intervened to make this happen faster.
Still, fuck Google Maps. I'm glad people are waking up to how this level of hegemony over maps gives corporations too much power.
I keep seeing this around. I've got friends at Google who have shared screenshots about the manual pull request (code change) that was made to update the name. They even have an internal shortlink pointing to that manual change since it's so dumb
Why is a lake name stored in code versus a database?
I wish this was talked about more. So much hay being made about this on the assumption that Google maintains their own database of locations instead of pulling from sources like GNIS like they actually do.
Fuck Google, but we don't need to make shit up to hate them. In fact, making shit up makes us seem crazy and hurts our position. These companies do enough real evil shit, we don't need to piss our time away on this non-issue.
Where's this fucking energy for Google removing sideloading from Android, for example. I've seen way more mainstream news about this one item on a fucking map than I have about the loss of sideloading and the loss of actual ownership of the devices we purchase.
To be fair, the average person doesn't know what sideloading is, while everyone will look at the map and see the changed name
It reminds me of this conspiracy that was circulating a few months back that Apple Maps had "deleted" cities and places in Lebanon to culturally erase it for Israel's invasion.
In reality (which you could see by e.g. looking at Reddit posts from a few years ago), Apple Maps' coverage of Lebanon was absolute unusable dogshit the entire time. There were complaints about how it wasn't even usable for basic navigation in Beirut. The city of Tyre (which was misspelled "Tyr") was still there despite being one of the hardest-hit cities by Israel's invasion.
Which was, to be fair, staggeringly incompetent, but it was provably true. Apple Maps' coverage sucked so badly that, at a surface level, it looked like somebody took an erase tool to a competent map.
I think a lot of people don't realize how automated corporate maps applications are. Which can be a weakness for crowd-sourced data like OpenStreetMap when there aren't enough contributors, but that democratization is also a huge benefit that anyone can see and fix issues. The main parts of Google Maps that aren't automated are points of interest, and those are kept up-to-date thanks to the network effect where e.g. business owners see value in maintaining their information or users feel like they're helping out (read: doing free labor for a trillion-dollar corporation).
It's just a bit silly considering how these companies have been leveraging publicly available information and how automated most of their systems actually are. It's part of why customer service at many of them (not Apple so much I guess) is absolutely abysmal and they basically do their best to try to avoid to having a human being in the customer service loop at all. Automating almost all software and removing the human element has literally been the name of the game for 20 years at least.
I mean the original Google ranking algorithm itself was partially made by checking the publicly available information (via web scraping) of how many times a site had been linked to from other sites. And to keep it accurate, they had to keep scraping constantly to keep updating the publicly available data for their own purposes. All of which was automated as well, by the way.