12

Often mistakenly referred to as choking, sexual strangulation in the mainstream is new. It has arrived into the bedrooms of young people via online porn which has become part of life, one of the many addictive services generously provided by tech companies making billions of dollars. Some companies do a good job of cleaning up the urgent issues of child sexual abuse material and trafficking, but still, violent porn proliferates.

Research that has analysed thousands of randomly chosen videos from popular pornographic websites found that physical aggression like strangulation, slapping and hair-pulling was present in 35-45% of scenes, depending on the website.

It’s important to be wary of clutching our pearls about porn here – there is no evidence to suggest that watching ethical porn results in an upswing in violent behaviour, but research released last year by the Australian Institute of Criminology does indeed show that more frequent intentional viewing of violent pornography is associated with a “small but statistically significant” increase in violence against women by men after they watched violent porn.

Some other facts to make you weep: sexual strangulation is now thought to be the second most common cause of strokes in women under 40 in the UK. It can lead to seizures, brain damage, memory issues, depression, anxiety. Two years ago an Australian study found that more than half of 4,700 people aged between 18 and 35 had engaged in sexual strangulation. A majority of them, 61%, had seen it depicted in porn. Others had seen it in movies, talked about it with friends.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hneerqe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This is so precious when I'm bombarded with ISP ads that became more like propaganda shorts on warm and fuzzy family life or life events and how they're always there for us.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
12 points (80.0% liked)

Wild Feed

637 readers
160 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Tag if needed:

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[D/M/Y] — If the publication is older than a month. You can just tag the year if the article is more than a year old.

[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.

*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason. Older publications are welcome as long as they include a date tag.

*Good quality means the source has a good reputation for accurate journalism with a reasonably clean fact checking record.

Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.

All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.

Sources posted here include:

https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/

https://www.apa.org/

apnews.com/

https://arstechnica.com/

https://www.theatlantic.com/

https://www.bbc.com/

https://www.earth.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/international

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/

https://lithub.com/

https://www.mentalfloss.com/

https://www.newscientist.com/

http://psychologytoday.com/

https://www.thequint.com/

https://www.reuters.com/

https://www.rfi.fr/en/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/

https://time.com/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/us

Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.

Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS