106
submitted 22 hours ago by nemeski@mander.xyz to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IanTwenty@piefed.social 34 points 21 hours ago

Affected users who are running X11 should audit their Zoom version, isolate conferencing workloads onto dedicated hardware or virtual machines, or move to a browser-based version of Zoom where sandboxing prevents unprompted clipboard access.

Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

[-] afterthewar@lemmus.org 1 points 2 minutes ago

Thank you. This is the summary I needed.

[-] Maybelline@lemmy.zip 36 points 21 hours ago

Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

And this is exactly why I put up with the functionality regressions of Wayland over X11 for the first few years.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

It’s just a better compositor. X is roughly half a million bandaids in a 30 year old trench coat.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 8 points 19 hours ago

I understood that all X11 apps running under Wayland are running inside the same environment, or is that wrong?

In other words, all X11 clipboards are shared.

I'm also not sure about clipboard isolation, since I'd have thought that copy/paste between Wayland and X11 would be expected.

[-] HER0@beehaw.org 3 points 8 hours ago

The Wayland spec doesn't allow for clients to arbitrarily get clipboard data under typical conditions. Since most applications these days are running under Wayland, it should be that copying to the clipboard isn't exposed to X11 clients most of the time (only when copying from or pasting into XWayland).

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
106 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14963 readers
664 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS