109
submitted 22 hours ago by nemeski@mander.xyz to c/linux@programming.dev
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 3 points 10 hours ago

Why is Zoom even still popular? Remember when Apple had to push a security update to undo its insane HTTP daemon? I guess we’re all just okay trusting their janky-ass Windows adjacent UI and security model.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 5 points 8 hours ago

jitsi is good feature wise, but it's not widely advertised..

[-] IanTwenty@piefed.social 35 points 21 hours ago

Affected users who are running X11 should audit their Zoom version, isolate conferencing workloads onto dedicated hardware or virtual machines, or move to a browser-based version of Zoom where sandboxing prevents unprompted clipboard access.

Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

[-] afterthewar@lemmus.org 1 points 33 minutes ago

Thank you. This is the summary I needed.

[-] Maybelline@lemmy.zip 37 points 21 hours ago

Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

And this is exactly why I put up with the functionality regressions of Wayland over X11 for the first few years.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

It’s just a better compositor. X is roughly half a million bandaids in a 30 year old trench coat.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 8 points 20 hours ago

I understood that all X11 apps running under Wayland are running inside the same environment, or is that wrong?

In other words, all X11 clipboards are shared.

I'm also not sure about clipboard isolation, since I'd have thought that copy/paste between Wayland and X11 would be expected.

[-] HER0@beehaw.org 3 points 8 hours ago

The Wayland spec doesn't allow for clients to arbitrarily get clipboard data under typical conditions. Since most applications these days are running under Wayland, it should be that copying to the clipboard isn't exposed to X11 clients most of the time (only when copying from or pasting into XWayland).

[-] artyom@piefed.social 36 points 22 hours ago

Yeah this is why Zoom is constantly pushing you to download their fucking app, and exactly why I don't fucking do it.

[-] lemmyng@piefed.ca 9 points 19 hours ago

Would the sandbox permissions in Flatpak be able to block this?

[-] defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I think so, but the sandbox can easily be broken in theory from what I heard. It'll probably be fine as long as Zoom doesn't add malicious code that does such a thing.

[-] eleijeep@piefed.social 11 points 22 hours ago
[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 14 points 21 hours ago

On some things.

On others he couldn't be more wrong.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 5 points 22 hours ago

I mean yes, but why this time?

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I'm going to have to go on some remote interviews sometime soon. I don't know if Zoom is the way those are usually done or if they use some other software that's more purpose-built for that. But whatever the case, I'll definitely have to figure out how to run whatever it is "in jail" somehow.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
109 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14963 readers
664 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS