201
How helpful
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
201 points (95.5% liked)
People Twitter
10412 readers
1055 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
- If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
obviously he adjusted his communication to be exactly as precise as her "hints" all day, she then intentionally reframed the situation to get support for "beeing innocent" while really beeing the one who has created the situation in the first place. standard gf behavoir, when the context is missing in her story, it is likely missing on purpose to hide exactly how she created the situation.
You live in a terrible world of your own making.
Way to just scream "I'm a sexist" at the top of your lungs
quite obvious indeed. I too like to extrapolate wildly speculative situations and motives from a likely fake twittter screenshot
EDIT: it's actually astounding how you managed to construct an entire cinematic universe around this tweet just to somehow shift the blame to the woman, despite the lack of literally any context.
Reddit truly keeps living on on this platform
I thought it was performance art of some sort.
thx for recognizing.