135
submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by iloveyou@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 8 hours ago

Sigh, guess it’s time to bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’

[-] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

Linux so far is mostly exempt and it's the big corporations like Microsoft, Apple, and Google who actually want it so they can sell that info and use it for ads. For Linux, just consider it one more criteria for choosing your distribution if it comes around. If the distro adds it as a requirement for install, then move to another. Fortunately there are lots of good ones these days.

[-] yestalgia@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Won't help much when the internet requires devices be verified by Google Play or equivalent to log into any accounts or do anything.

I guess maybe you can paint pictures and self-host things on your DIY OS, but the stuff web like banking etc that integrates you into society won't be accessible.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 15 points 8 hours ago

I fucking guess. I am at the point where I will take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID in order to participate and learn. I’m almost at the point where I would rather lose my job than comply with this

[-] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 8 points 6 hours ago

take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID

don't know where you live, but here in the ol' U of K, schools have been doing that sort of thing for over 20 years! I was appalled when I first heard about it, and I think it was from a friend whose kids had to give fingerprints. "Oh yes I know - big brother, but it's so convenient" was their attitude.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

It is appalling, but I could see parents from 20 years ago being less concerned than now. Of course back then they weren’t aggregating user data to today’s level, at least I don’t think.

What bothers me too are things like Palintir. Like, I don’t want my kid in some massive police database before they even turn 12

[-] gog@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

You should do that regardless, who's in his sane mind would trust his kids minds to the gov

[-] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 8 hours ago

Children don't usually have ID. You only need to provide ID to prove you're an adult.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

My country provides ID from birth.

Biometrics are only collected around 5 years old, and only for the indicators, while signature only is requested around 7, after pre-school or first year of literacy.

Photo is taken with days or weeks. The state, all of us, recognize everyone as a citizens and their rights from birth.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I didn't say anything about having ID. I said you only need to submit ID to get access to adult content.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 minutes ago

Not really.

I got surprised a few months back with a shopping site requesting age verification. Of all things.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

I'm inclined to believe that infrastructure already exists (both state intelligence services and corpos like Meta), this is about being able to use it in the legal system and getting people to self censor.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

For normal activities this absolutely exists, and when you are just being you on the internet, a nation state could easily track you down.

However, it's exploitable and avoidable. Probably not entirely, but if you want to you can make their life difficult.

They won't stop until your digital identification cryptographically signs every packet you send, I guarantee it.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago

It won't but that's the way it is now.

[-] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

bust open a pre-code copy of ‘How to build Linux from scratch’

Short term, that'll help. Long term, it won't.

Sure, you can do that. Then what? If every single site requires a secure attestation from an identity service before you can use it, you re boned. Want to shop? Bank? Social media? Check the gd weather? If the site won't serve you w/o a strong identity proof, then linux won't save you. Linux will be an island.

IDK if it'll get that far. But it isn't that far fetched. Already today, I estimate 50% of site I try to use won't answer me if I totally block fingerprints and use a VPN. I'm talking mundane shit, recipes, car repair info, w/e. If I remove my privacy protections, they work fine. Nothing stops that from happening to any OS that deosn't prove a trusted ID attestation.

[-] adwijoma@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

On those sites, have you tried VPN + ad blocking?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 hours ago

i'm going to switch to devuan since systemd already pre-complied wo anyone commanding them to.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 7 hours ago

This is such a weird stance given the actual change that was made. No actual age verification, no external communication of any kind. All that got added is a number field. The ability to store a number labeled "age" for user accounts. That's it.

There already is a field for first name and last name. You can leave them blank as well (most probably do). If any software requires a number to be there, just enter 99 or whatever. Unless this gets severely worse this is such a nothing-burger.

I'm not happy about any step into that direction either, but pick your battles (or hill I guess). This certainly is a weird one.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

"As a frog, you should wait until the water is already boiling before you hop"

[-] who@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Devuan, AntiX, and MX Linux all seem worth a look for people wanting to avoid systemd. More are listed here:

https://itsfoss.com/systemd-free-distros/

https://systemdfree.com/#distros

(FWIW, I think systemd's age data collection is optional, at least for now. It's not clear which Linux distros will implement/adopt it by default.)

[-] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

no mention of guix on a systemd less distro list is crazy. not that i use guix, and im fine with systemd as a nixos user, but it feels like guix is the anti nixos. the richard stallman version of nixos with all the pros and cons that come with that

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 5 minutes ago

I run mine with the nonguix repository so I don't think Stallman would approve of how I lead my life (with all the pros and cons that come with that).

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
135 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

50961 readers
1597 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS