133
submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by iloveyou@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 15 points 8 hours ago

I fucking guess. I am at the point where I will take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID in order to participate and learn. I’m almost at the point where I would rather lose my job than comply with this

[-] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 8 points 6 hours ago

take my children out of school if they are forced to do face scans or give any ID

don't know where you live, but here in the ol' U of K, schools have been doing that sort of thing for over 20 years! I was appalled when I first heard about it, and I think it was from a friend whose kids had to give fingerprints. "Oh yes I know - big brother, but it's so convenient" was their attitude.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago

It is appalling, but I could see parents from 20 years ago being less concerned than now. Of course back then they weren’t aggregating user data to today’s level, at least I don’t think.

What bothers me too are things like Palintir. Like, I don’t want my kid in some massive police database before they even turn 12

[-] gog@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

You should do that regardless, who's in his sane mind would trust his kids minds to the gov

[-] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 8 hours ago

Children don't usually have ID. You only need to provide ID to prove you're an adult.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

My country provides ID from birth.

Biometrics are only collected around 5 years old, and only for the indicators, while signature only is requested around 7, after pre-school or first year of literacy.

Photo is taken with days or weeks. The state, all of us, recognize everyone as a citizens and their rights from birth.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I didn't say anything about having ID. I said you only need to submit ID to get access to adult content.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 minutes ago

Not really.

I got surprised a few months back with a shopping site requesting age verification. Of all things.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

I'm inclined to believe that infrastructure already exists (both state intelligence services and corpos like Meta), this is about being able to use it in the legal system and getting people to self censor.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

For normal activities this absolutely exists, and when you are just being you on the internet, a nation state could easily track you down.

However, it's exploitable and avoidable. Probably not entirely, but if you want to you can make their life difficult.

They won't stop until your digital identification cryptographically signs every packet you send, I guarantee it.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago

It won't but that's the way it is now.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
133 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

50961 readers
1597 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS