215
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by iloveyou@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 14 hours ago

Children don't usually have ID. You only need to provide ID to prove you're an adult.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

My country provides ID from birth.

Biometrics are only collected around 5 years old, and only for the indicators, while signature only is requested around 7, after pre-school or first year of literacy.

Photo is taken with days or weeks. The state, all of us, recognize everyone as a citizens and their rights from birth.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago

I didn't say anything about having ID. I said you only need to submit ID to get access to adult content.

[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 5 hours ago

Australia has age verification to access social media, with an age minimum of 16. I've heard other countries are thinking of following.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

Not really.

I got surprised a few months back with a shopping site requesting age verification. Of all things.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago

What site? Were they selling adult products?

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

A small scale site in my country. And I was trying to purchase ropes, for making dog leashes.

[-] iloveyou@lemmy.zip 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I’m 100% not convinced that it will stay this way. This, to me, is a push towards ID verification. Age verification is a first step. To me, it feels more like a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago

a step towards building an infrastructure to track any user

I'm inclined to believe that infrastructure already exists (both state intelligence services and corpos like Meta), this is about being able to use it in the legal system and getting people to self censor.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

For normal activities this absolutely exists, and when you are just being you on the internet, a nation state could easily track you down.

However, it's exploitable and avoidable. Probably not entirely, but if you want to you can make their life difficult.

They won't stop until your digital identification cryptographically signs every packet you send, I guarantee it.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago

It won't but that's the way it is now.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
215 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

50961 readers
1881 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS