236
RatGPT (lemmy.nz)
submitted 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] charokol@lemmy.zip 102 points 6 hours ago

I got my masters in machine learning years before LLMs took off. I’d usually tell people I work in “AI“. Even though it wasn’t quite accurate, people understood it easier than ML.

The conversations would inevitably turn to joking about Skynet or AI taking over the world. I would reassure people that these models are only mimicking intelligence; they can make predictions, or they can classify data into categories, or they can generate text, etc, based on analyzing the patterns of data they’ve previously seen, but that’s it. They don’t understand anything, they can’t make decisions or act on their own. I’d tell people there couldn’t be an AI apocalypse because we would never be dumb enough to give them that ability.

I don’t know why I gave us so much credit

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 48 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

YEP. I'm not in AI but I'm in cyber security.

I used to tell people that there's very little actual risk, because if we had something even half as concerning as AGI (which I'd argue we did with chatgpt 3.5), that we'd easily be able to lock it down and prevent it from doing anything funny.

Super intelligence isn't just going to magically spawn on 32 GB ram in a sandboxed environment. And AGI will not magically know how sandboxed it is or how to escape.

...then I saw people letting Claude send emails and use their credit card on their behalf like immediately when it was able to do things that appeared intelligent.

They literally saw the smallest hint of AGI and said, "here's my credit card and identity, take the wheel".

There was no fucking talk of sandboxing. Everyone turned that off so they didn't have to click the "allow" button.

Not that I think we're at any risk of ASI since it seems more like we hit a logarithmic wall, but we are absolutely at risk of letting random algorithms destroy critical parts of infrastructure because people are lazy and stupid and managed by even worse people.

I would not be surprised if the right AI hallucinations could cause a nuclear bomb to go off right now. I'm not talking about super intelligence, just automated super idiocy.

Proof: literally this post is about an idiot letting an AI control their fucking email and it emailed the FBI because it was fucking stupid

[-] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 15 points 4 hours ago

We live in a period of extreme stupidity, so I now fully expect AI to cause disasters in the same idiotic and tragically hilarious way.

I expect AI to trigger a war because some idiot trusted it blindly without double checking (oh wait, it almost already happened!), and I'm sure there are plenty of people currently lobbying to have AI directly connected to weapons.

Skynet is not going to have the objective to conquer the world, it's going to have the objective of maximizing paperclip production.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

You'd be surprised at how many humans are mimicking intelligence.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

I'm guessing this means you got your master's before transformers made sequential data processing so parallelizable that it'd be commercially viable to let Bob down the street into the "we" who wouldn't be dumb enough to give them that ability.

I think your assumption was reasonable.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
236 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

12174 readers
4786 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS