20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

I'm worried that "extended to services outside of TV" means the end of BBC podcasts outside of BBC Sounds. They're already limited, for instance with a week's delay in some cases, but I'd be really sad if I lost all of them. I'm not really sure what else they could extend it to, unless they also make news paywalled, which would go against the whole point of the organisation.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

I don't like paying the licence fee because in a whole year I barely watch two shows on the BBC. However I carnivorously munch my way through their podcasts and have fond memories of watching BBC content as a child so I pay the fee each year.

If they start limiting more and more the content and podcast radio services, well... that would be a shame. I will cancel my payments.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

I feel quite similar. I love the idea of the BBC and I have fond memories of listening to comedy shows with my dad in the car as a kid. I think they do good investigative journalism, although I wish they were less timid. I consume the panel shows, podcasts, the news website. I really want to support it and help it succeed.

But, they really frustrate me when they try to lock things down. If podcasts go sounds-only, I'll stop listening, because I don't want two different ways of consuming podcasts, and supporting open standards is more important to me than supporting the BBC.

I understand that they lock things down to prevent people free-riding, but I wish the government would stick a progressive ring-fenced tax on, and then they could release everything openly to everyone. Every step away from that feels like a dilution of its role as a public service.

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

News is paywalled isn’t it? It started fairly recently, but for me in Canada, a lot of articles ask for money.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

BBC.com news is paywalled but only in US/CAN.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah right, I was talking about domestically, where it's still available to everyone including those who don't pay. But I think paywalling internationally is wrong too.

[-] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Agreed. I hate this, the BBC has some wicked podcasts but their RSS feeds are a state. I'd pay a couple quid a month to have BBC sounds without BBC sounds.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Oooo that's an idea, I'd also pay so much for subscriber-only RSS feeds like Nebula, if they were undelayed, had all the shows and didn't have adverts for BBC sounds every 30 mins.

Hopefully Lisa Nandy is reading this thread 🤣

[-] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Nebula have rss feeds iirc im sure I use one for their Layover podcast

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

7018 readers
481 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS