20
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] withabeard@feddit.uk 12 points 4 weeks ago

The ridiculousness of the license fee is only highlighted in the modern world.

Tesco do not come hounding me because I've not been shopping in there. Yet routinely for the last 20 years I've been hounded by collectors from Capita about the license fee. Intimidating letters, bouncers at the door trying to barge in, demanding they can see my TV through the windows. The bullying tactics of this are the exact reason I refuse to pay for it.

Move to a better model, put all the old back catalogue on iPlayer and charge a monthly subscription like Netflix. Use the profits from that to subsidise the over the airwaves stuff. Bill me because I use it, don't threaten me because I don't.

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Trying to restrict iPlayer access to the UK is absurd and self defeating. There's a huge international market who would gladly pay to watch iPlayer, but the BBC refuses to take their money. Go spend your money on a VPN instead.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 4 points 4 weeks ago

I'm worried that "extended to services outside of TV" means the end of BBC podcasts outside of BBC Sounds. They're already limited, for instance with a week's delay in some cases, but I'd be really sad if I lost all of them. I'm not really sure what else they could extend it to, unless they also make news paywalled, which would go against the whole point of the organisation.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 4 weeks ago

I don't like paying the licence fee because in a whole year I barely watch two shows on the BBC. However I carnivorously munch my way through their podcasts and have fond memories of watching BBC content as a child so I pay the fee each year.

If they start limiting more and more the content and podcast radio services, well... that would be a shame. I will cancel my payments.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago

I feel quite similar. I love the idea of the BBC and I have fond memories of listening to comedy shows with my dad in the car as a kid. I think they do good investigative journalism, although I wish they were less timid. I consume the panel shows, podcasts, the news website. I really want to support it and help it succeed.

But, they really frustrate me when they try to lock things down. If podcasts go sounds-only, I'll stop listening, because I don't want two different ways of consuming podcasts, and supporting open standards is more important to me than supporting the BBC.

I understand that they lock things down to prevent people free-riding, but I wish the government would stick a progressive ring-fenced tax on, and then they could release everything openly to everyone. Every step away from that feels like a dilution of its role as a public service.

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

News is paywalled isn’t it? It started fairly recently, but for me in Canada, a lot of articles ask for money.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago

BBC.com news is paywalled but only in US/CAN.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Ah right, I was talking about domestically, where it's still available to everyone including those who don't pay. But I think paywalling internationally is wrong too.

[-] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Agreed. I hate this, the BBC has some wicked podcasts but their RSS feeds are a state. I'd pay a couple quid a month to have BBC sounds without BBC sounds.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Oooo that's an idea, I'd also pay so much for subscriber-only RSS feeds like Nebula, if they were undelayed, had all the shows and didn't have adverts for BBC sounds every 30 mins.

Hopefully Lisa Nandy is reading this thread 🤣

[-] giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Nebula have rss feeds iirc im sure I use one for their Layover podcast

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

Buying in content seems like a huge waste of money given how the modern media landscape works. I also really have no interest in buying a licence - my options are to pay for a year or to pay for nothing. The lack of middle ground means I simply opt out.

[-] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Middle ground in the sense of paying monthly, or paying less for a limited subsection of the content?

I ask because I pay by monthly direct debit. When I was a student, I also paid while I was using it and then cancelled it when I was not, and got a refund for the time I didn't use it.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 3 points 4 weeks ago

Either, both?

When I looked into it last that option didn't show up for me.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

7015 readers
628 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS